18
   

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

 
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Nov, 2009 06:21 pm
I don't consider that serious Joe. I think it is a pile of pigshit designed to draw attention away from an inability to answer the question. Piles of pigshit do have that effect.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Nov, 2009 06:24 pm
Sorry--I forgot to say that I do not already know the answer and I am confident that neither does anybody else.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Nov, 2009 06:25 pm
Im trying to figure out whether Flaubert ever built a curragh out of indigenous materials in a barn in pennsylvania, or whether he was subject to the vicissitudes of the psychosomatic realm.
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Nov, 2009 06:34 pm
He kept one of Louise's slippers in a desk drawer. If that helps.

And there was a stuffed parrot as well as oriental dressing gowns and blowing smoke rings in the brothel doing doggie with an ugly as a performance for his pals.

Thomas Hardy had a better trick but I'll refrain from going into details because I can't do it myself.
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Nov, 2009 08:35 pm
as did Laurlan Hardy
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 08:26 am
Pig shit. Ahem.
Spendius, your claim to not know the answer to your question is the real pig shit here. Oh, and "no one else does either". (That seems more like horseshit to me, but unlike you, I'm no expert on scatology.)

Do you seriously think that any of us believe you when you say such things? Given all that you have said here regarding your vast studies? Are you telling us now that you do not know how the sciences involved in fossil study work? You do know about such things, right? Otherwise you would not be proffering an honest opinion on the matter. That would be pigshit upon pigshit.

So, let me ask you. What do you know about your question other than your ridiculous claim of ignorance of it's answer?

Joe(Shovel in Hand)Nation
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 09:33 am
Quote:
How do we know that Ardipithecus ramidus was not on the way out rather than the other way? There seems to be some assumption that it's a step to us rather than to extinction.


This is the question I was referring to Joe.

I don't know the answer.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 10:07 am
Who is the "we" who don't know. It's the pigs shitting in the pigsty and apparently refers to PSXXX's buddies in the pub. He "saw the video" on the NSF's evolution site and that's all that there is to be stated about the intent of the NSF. There's nothing else on the site to encourage people to learn more about evolution, something PSXXX doesn't care to do as he's already made up his mind. Flaubert has all the answers he needs, except the shoe is not in the drawer but up his ass.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 11:28 am
We all know and understand that spendi spews shit all the time; it's a wonder he can't smell the stench himself.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 11:47 am
Any decisive view on the question boys?

"We" are all those that the hype about the Ardi was intended to influence.
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 11:49 am
It's a rhetorical "we." No analysis needed.
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 12:00 pm
Was Ardi perhaps influential in the political or business world? Just what is "hyped" influence? He doesn't have the slightest idea but watch him try and fake it.
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 12:03 pm
It was put out that Ardi was the missing link. Which is to say a step to us. It was not mentioned that it might have been being selected out when it carked it and fell into the mud. In which case it would be the opposite to the missing link.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 01:15 pm
As usual, you are full of it:

Move over, Lucy. And kiss the missing link goodbye.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091001-oldest-human-skeleton-ardi-missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

What are you reading for your science today -- those right wing blogs that get everything wrong?
  0  
Reply Fri 6 Nov, 2009 02:31 pm
I notice effemm hasn't thought fit to offer a definitive judgment.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 08:25 am

"Sex for food". I guess they weren't so different from us after all Smile
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 09:19 am
Lightwizard wrote:

As usual, you are full of it:

Move over, Lucy. And kiss the missing link goodbye.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091001-oldest-human-skeleton-ardi-missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html

What are you reading for your science today -- those right wing blogs that get everything wrong?


According to spendi, ardipithecus ramidus created complex civilizations that crumbled into the dirt and were lost for all time. Not just once, but probable multiple times.
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 10:22 am
That's not what I said. I am merely exposing how you have been led to accept something that isn't necessarily true so that you can make psuedo-scientific conversation in order to aggressively show off your superiority over us poor numbskulls.
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 10:30 am
So true! "Numbskull" befits you perfectly.
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Nov, 2009 11:47 am
That could be expressed in reverse and be on target:

Why aren't we so different from them in basic instincts -- how slow is evolution? Obviously, painfully slow. While we congratulate ourselves for technological advances, we haven't basically haven't separated ourselves very much from our most primitive ancestors. We have made a technological advance in weaponry so we can more efficiently do away with animals and, unfortunately, ourselves.

Of course, today it's more refined as "the dinner date."
I forgot who recently quipped (might have been Wanda Sykes on Jay Leno) that the sex should come before the dinner date so both parties could determine whether it was worth the price of the restaurant.
 

Related Topics

Future of evolution - Question by elletheduck
Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Non-Evolution of Modern Man - Discussion by gungasnake
SINGLE CELL FOSSIL - Discussion by hamburger
Steven Gould and Uncle Don Carney - Discussion by gungasnake
Evolution!!! - Discussion by chezymeeez
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 11/21/2009 at 06:05:22 Top End