It sounds as if ros has no idea how to answer RL's question and contents himself, as usual, with just slagging it off. It also sounds as if ros thinks science can't answer it either.
And when one considers the relative nobility of the competing hypotheses it is easy to see why 85% of Americans accept the noblest in the absence of any definitive answer to the question. The other 15% probably have some subjective reason for choosing the baser one.
After several years of explaining the concept that common ancestor doesnt mean direct parentage, I think we just gave up on RL's speciosity. (I just made that up)
Good word, though . . . useful . . .
There can be no nobility in self deception and lies, oh spendi one.
farmerman wrote:After several years of explaining the concept that common ancestor doesnt mean direct parentage, I think we just gave up on RL's speciosity. (I just made that up)
Is that like the Pomposity of Speciousness?
Or the "Pomposity of Spendi." LOL
