Good try Walter, quick but...I said before Maine Road.
and it was Hyde Road ground.
So smorgs wins.
Prize is an all expenses paid taxi ride to the ship canal, and back.
Soz, Walter...just realised you weren't talking about the City match (is there any other team?) :wink:
Walter
tonight Utd 2 Milan 1
Utd go through on away goal rule
Mrs Steve says utd "not a cat in hells chance"
Quote:MCFC was originally formed as St Mark's in West Gorton, Manchester in 1880, and played on a piece of waste ground at Clowes Street.
Source
That's "before", isn't it?
I know that cat, btw. Thus: you may be right, Steve.
immediately before !!
Actually dont you think that was pretty amazing to see City at Hyde Road
then Maine road opened 1924!!!
then City of manchester.
Moved there in 2003?
Thats 80+ years supporting MCFC.
(I always thought he was a little strange but a Grand Old Gent for all that)
ps Smorgs
be back by 9pm and dont even think about swimming
How did the Ship Canal get in this thread?
(I cross it at least twice a day over Barton Bridge)
How come Joe Royle has to pay back £400 000?
That's some overpayment.
Joe's not as daft as he looks, evidently.
> Latest News
CITY WIN ROYLE BATTLE
Tuesday 08 March 2005
Former Manchester City boss Joe Royle has been stripped by Appeal Court judges of his £423,000 compensation payout.
Royle was sacked by the club in 2001 and he subsequently sued City when he received only a fraction of the pay-off he claimed he was due in May 2001.
JOE ROYLE
However, Lord Justice Sedley, Lady Justice Smith and Lord Justice Gage overturned the earlier court award. Royle, now Ipswich Town boss, was also ordered on Tuesday to pay City's legal costs, which were thought to be over £80,000.
The club had urged the appeal judges to reflect the reality of the circumstances at the time of Royle's departure in May 2001. It asked the judges to rule that he was not entitled to be compensated on a full salary basis as though the club were still in the Premiership.
Mr Royle argued that the club was not actually sent down to the First Division until some time later, when the three relegated clubs handed over their Premiership company shares to the three promoted teams.
But Lady Justice Smith said that, whether the club was about to be or had just been relegated, it was inevitably going to play in the First Division the following season and the manager, but for his dismissal, would have been on a lower rate of pay.
Mr Royle was refused leave to appeal further to the House of Lords.
But if it was a Royal?
Viva la Republica Britanica
McT
My second prize was the sewage works at Barton. So I'm glad Smorgs got first.
Without reading thru 8 pages of notes I wonder if the question was ever answered correctly using the second law of thermodynamics - a hot body radiates heat more effectively than a cold body.
Heat flow become alot more efficent as temperature rises. So the 75 degree vessel will radiate heat faster than a 65 degree vessel gains heat. The 75 degree will get to 70 faster than the 65.
Thank you so much g__day, a most succint answer...just what I wanted!
...you can put your tongue back in now...
Smorgs, or anyone, how can you tell who is correct?
How can one ever tell, when anything is correct?
As far as I'm concerned, just about everything is subject to change.
Are there such thing's as momentary truths? (the truth as we know it at the moment)
Excuse the derailing.
Some things are certainties paula...they just are...like love, and puppies, roses and WEDDING BELLS <smorgs slaps herself around the face shouting "snap out of you pre-wedding fuge">
Sorry 'bout that Paula, I'm full of 'big day' bliss...
...back to my shower thread :wink:
WEDDING BELLS may be a certainty, but weddings are not.
You...you havn't chaged your mind, have you ci? :wink:
Naw. You've seen those 'movies' where the bride runs off from the alter with another man, haven't you? Or the fact that some weddings last a day or a week. WEDDING BELLS, yes. Weddings, no.
Oh no...I've gone from puppies and roses to 'am I doing the right thing'?
Cheers! :wink:
