Global Warming...New Report...and it ain't happy news

but scientists warned that the next solar transition will not be enough to save the world from global warming.

Translation : keep the money coming, we are loving the life style..

No . How is that relevant to a criticism of scientists and funding ?

Translation : keep the money coming, we are loving the life style.

Quote:

No . How is that relevant to a criticism of scientists and funding ?

I didn't question anything about there work as scientists and/funding of the work.

In that instance the chance of the earth getting warmer is well over 50%.

I find it funny that you want us to rely on the 15% chance

Translation : keep the money coming, we are loving the life style.

To mark the final day of the 65th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting, on Friday, 3 July, over 30 Nobel laureates assembled on Mainau Island on Lake Constance signed a declaration on climate change. The "Mainau Declaration 2015 on Climate Change" states "that the nations of the world must take the opportunity at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris in December 2015 to take decisive action to limit future global emissions." It is expected that a new international agreement on climate protection will be approved at the 21st UN Climate Conference to succeed the Kyoto Protocol.[...]
The Mainau Declaration 2015 is the result of an initiative on the part of Nobel Science Laureates who took part in the 65th Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting. The signatories to the declaration have all been awarded Nobel Prizes in physiology or medicine, in physics or in chemistry. Some of the laureates who have not attended the final day of the meeting had already put their names to the declaration earlier at Lindau. [...]

We undersigned scientists, who have been awarded Nobel Prizes, have come to the shores of Lake Constance in southern Germany, to share insights with promising young researchers, who like us come from around the world. Nearly 60 years ago, here on Mainau, a similar gathering of Nobel Laureates in science issued a declaration of the dangers inherent in the newly found technology of nuclear weapons—a technology derived from advances in basic science. So far we have avoided nuclear war though the threat remains. We believe that our world today faces another threat of comparable magnitude.
... ... ... ... ... ...

They have this statement that the cost of solar photoelectric is the same as hydrocarbon's. And that us one of those misleadingly meaningless statements.

Without a substantial carbon tax, there’s no incentive for innovators or plant buyers to switch.

Realistically, we may not get more than a doubling in government funding of energy R&D—but I would love to see a tripling

in the near term, the Pacific oscillation, this El Niño thing, has a much bigger impact on current weather than climate change has had so far. Now, climate change keeps climbing all the time—it just keeps summing, summing, summing, and adding up. So, as you get up to 2050, 2080, 2100, its effect overwhelms the Pacific oscillation.

That’s why we really need to solve that dilemma, we need innovation that gives us energy that’s cheaper than today’s hydrocarbon energy, that has zero CO2 emissions, and that’s as reliable as today’s overall energy system. And when you put all those requirements together, we need an energy miracle.