378
   

NeoPets Riddles (Lenny Conundrums) and Answers Here

 
 
View Profile geddoe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 01:38 pm
so did anyone get the answer right?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 02:13 pm
the answer is year 8...
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 02:40 pm
purplemonkey wrote:
lunababy107 wrote:
andrewkatz wrote:
Close this board probably 1000 people see this. Just because they do not reply here does not mean that they do not read it. IF you type 'lenny conundrum answer neopets' into google this is now the fifth site that comes up.
Hello Mr. Hypocrite. Why the heck were you googling lenny conundrum answers for if you think it's soooo wrong.


im sure he was just googlin it to see what neopets was talkin bout. right andrew? :wink:


That is exactly what I did. And this time it showed up first. I wanted to see if anybody read my message
0 Replies
 
View Profile stapel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 03:21 pm
deshwitatenator wrote:
the answer is year 8...

"Year 8"? That's what they were wanting?

Shocked

Any clues what that means...?

Eliz.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 07:34 pm
That's the current year in Neopia, but they haven't specified yet how to arrive at that Confused [besides GUESS]
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 08:16 pm
How do you know that the answer is year 8?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 09:20 pm
lenny last week
the results was posted on the game page under week 148.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 09:26 pm
New LC
8k - 5n = 8r
2u + o = 108
2m + 10d = 3c
2u + 3r= 10m
10b - L = 8m
3k - 4i = 2i
3n - 3o = c
o - c = 4d
3n - 7d = 10m
2d + 2e = 3b
9n - 9r = 8i
6b + 3c = 14m
4y - 2m = 6u

L + e + n + n + y + c + o + n + u + n + d + r + u + m = ???
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 09:33 pm
Lenny Conundrum
Sorry! I'm trying to figure it out.. but im TERRIBLE at math!!!


The only idea I have it to work it out on excel or a spread sheet!
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 09:45 pm
you can start with the only base number given of 189 and work out that formula. that should help u get some of the letters going for the other problems
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 09:48 pm
That's what I've been trying to do. It's slow going though. I'm maybe halfway through.
0 Replies
 
View Profile markr
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jan, 2006 10:51 pm
b = 20
c = 30
d = 6
e = 24
i = 36
k = 72
L = 80
m = 15
n = 64
o = 54
r = 32
u = 27
y = 48

80+24+64+64+48+30+54+64+27+64+6+32+27+15 = 599
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 12:35 am
I got a MUCH lower number than that....
0 Replies
 
View Profile stapel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 01:31 am
After some rearrangement, we have the following system of equations:

. .. . 0b + 0c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 8k + 0L + .0m - .5n + 0o - .8r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b + 0c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L + .0m + 0n + 1o + 0r + 2u + 0y = 108
. .. . 0b - .3c + 10d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L + .2m + 0n + 0o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b + 0c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L -.10m + 0n + 0o + 3r + 2u + 0y = . . 0
. . .10b + 0c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 0k - .1L - . 8m + 0n + 0o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b + 0c + . 0d + 0e - .6i + 3k + 0L + .0m + 0n + 0o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b - .1c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L + .0m + 3n - .3o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b - .1c - .. 4d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L + .0m + 0n + 1o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b + 0c - .. 7d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L -.10m + 3n + 0o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. .-3b + 0c + . 2d + 2e + 0i + 0k + 0L + .0m + 0n + 0o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b + 0c + . 0d + 0e - .8i + 0k + 0L + .0m + 9n + 0o - .9r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 6b + 3c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L -.14m + 0n + 0o + 0r + 0u + 0y = . . 0
. .. . 0b + 0c + . 0d + 0e + 0i + 0k + 0L - . 2m + 0n + 0o + 0r - .6u + 4y = . . 0

I set up the system of thirteen variables in thirteen equations as a matrix, and used solver software to obtain the following:

. . . . .b = 20
. . . . .c = 30
. . . . .d = 6
. . . . .e = 24
. . . . .i = 36
. . . . .k = 72
. . . . .L = 80
. . . . .m = 15
. . . . .n = 64
. . . . .o = 54
. . . . .r = 32
. . . . .u = 27
. . . . .y = 48

In other words, the software echoes the solution markr proposed.

Eliz.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 09:24 am
["Year 8"? That's what they were wanting?

Shocked

Any clues what that means...?

Eliz.]

Year 8 because it was round 148.

1 is for January
4 is the day they judge the lenny conundrum
8..year 8
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 02:48 pm
You only added n once in lenny, so the answer is 663
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 03:11 pm
LC answer
[You only added n once in lenny, so the answer is 663]

No, they were right. There are 14 characters in 'Lenny Conundrum' and they had 14 numbers added up to 599.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 04:24 pm
Re: New LC
hi im new here.
and i was thinking that maybe the LC is different for different people now i dunno cause elybelly posted

elybelly wrote:
8k - 5n = 8r
2u + o = 108
2m + 10d = 3c
2u + 3r= 10m
10b - L = 8m
3k - 4i = 2i
3n - 3o = c
o - c = 4d
3n - 7d = 10m
2d + 2e = 3b
9n - 9r = 8i
6b + 3c = 14m
4y - 2m = 6u

L + e + n + n + y + c + o + n + u + n + d + r + u + m = ???


but mine on the site is

Quote:
8k - 5n = 8r
u + 2o = 135
5d + 2c = 6m
2u + 3r= 10m
10b - L = 8m
3k - 4i = 2i
3n - 3o = c
2o + 3c = 33d
8i + 9r = 9n
10m + 7d = 3n
4d + 4e = 6b
4y - 6u = 2m
6b + 3c = 14m

L + e + n + n + y + c + o + n + u + n + d + r + u + m = ???


some numbers are different..



ok actually i think its just rearranged. i dunno
0 Replies
 
View Profile stapel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 04:41 pm
Re: New LC
It appears that the system of equations may have been tweaked. Looking at the first two equations, we have:

elybelly wrote:
8k - 5n = 8r
2u + o = 108
....

_snow_22 wrote:
8k - 5n = 8r
u + 2o = 135
....

Since no equation other than the second one in each system has a strictly numerical term (that is, a term containing no variable), this new system cannot be simply a "rearrangement" of the original one, since (I'm pretty sure) no combination of the original equations would have created that new second equation.

However, before anybody panics, plug the original solution values for each letter into the new system's equations. As long as all the new equations work out to be true statements, the original solution of "599" is still valid.

For instance, the new third equation, "5d + 2c = 6m", evaluates as 5(6) + 2(30) = 30 + 60 = 90 for the left-hand side and as 6(15) = 90 for the right-hand side, so the original system's variable values work in the new third equation. Test all the other new equations, to verify the original solution.

Eliz.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 05:01 pm
o ok i tested them there right

thanks
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lenny Conundrum #133 - Discussion by moon lights shadow
lenny conundrum - Discussion by goose12000
Lenny conundrum May 2009 - Discussion by kaleli
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.4 seconds on 11/28/2009 at 12:23:43 Top End