1
   

How dumb can americans get?

 
 
Post: # 995,396
View Profile Don1
 
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 08:45 am
Dont blame me I'm not asking the question, this was asked by the Daily Mirror this morning.http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/mirror/nov2004/1/0/000ADF94-E181-1189-B6E080BFB6FA0000.jpg
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link/Embed
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 397 • Replies: 18

 
Post: # 995,407
View Profile Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 08:50 am
Don't ask me, I'm from a BLUE state. We feel very isolated, here on the Pacific coast.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 08:59 am
55,574,580 of us knew better...
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 09:18 am
I didn't realize it was a contest.......
0 Replies
 
Post: # 995,498
View Profile woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 09:25 am
Well how silly of 59M Americans to think that Daily Mirror knows better than they do about how to vote in their nation.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 11:05 am
Quote:
I didn't realize it was a contest.......
isn't that what we call something that has a winner and a loser?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 11:08 am
Region Philbis wrote:
Quote:
I didn't realize it was a contest.......
isn't that what we call something that has a winner and a loser?


see...dumb american :wink: Laughing
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 12:19 pm
Piffka wrote:
Don't ask me, I'm from a BLUE state. We feel very isolated, here on the Pacific coast.


Me too! http://www.mainzelahr.de/smile/cool/yo.gif
0 Replies
 
Post: # 996,088
View Profile RfromP
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 12:55 pm
I've asked myself the same question. Record deficit, most jobs lost in 75 years, gas prices through the roof and a war for no reason. I'm astonished. What good did George W. do?? If it weren't for 9/11 I suspect Georgie boy wouldn't have been reelected.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 996,103
View Profile Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 12:59 pm
If it weren't for 9/11 none of those other problems would be such a problem.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 996,112
View Profile cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 01:03 pm
Apparently, 56M of them were dumb enough to nominate John Kerry for president.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 01:10 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Apparently, 56M of them were dumb enough to nominate John Kerry for president.


hmmm... 59m for bush. and only a measley 56m for kerry. you're right cj. nobody at all voted for kerry.

good thing that it's only about 1/2 of the country that is out of the "mainstream".
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 01:33 pm
'If it weren't for 9/11 I suspect Georgie boy wouldn't have been reelected.'

Hard to say since 9/11 was directly (or indirectly) responsible for everything you list there.

Except for the gas prices...blame that on those who don't wish to see us energy independant.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 996,234
View Profile Joanie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 01:50 pm
We simply do not defeat an incumbent president in wartime. After wars surely, but never in their midst.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 01:58 pm
Kristie wrote:
If it weren't for 9/11 none of those other problems would be such a problem.


As I've said before, we've had worse wars and more expensive tragedies, but never such a deficit. Accepting responsibility is the first step to rational policy.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 02:01 pm
Joanie wrote:
We simply do not defeat an incumbent president in wartime. After wars surely, but never in their midst.


Allowing war to insulate a presidency creates perverse incentives.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 02:04 pm
Step, I agree....we should spend less.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 02:05 pm
Where to begin spending less?

Are we going to cut health care funding, school funding? Scientific research?

At some point, maybe we should think about taking in more as well as spending less?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Nov, 2004 02:14 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Where to begin spending less?

Are we going to cut health care funding, school funding? Scientific research?

At some point, maybe we should think about taking in more as well as spending less?

Cycloptichorn


Normally, I would hesitate to "take in more," but at this point, we have enough of a problem that prudent budget cutting will not do the trick, particularly given the needy state of some of our existing programs. Yes, we overspent during these last four years, and I agree--we need to approach that problem from both a "revenue" and an "expense" angle. As a generally small gov. sort of guy, this makes me wince--but policy making isn't a cakewalk.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
Obama..... not religious? - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
  1. able2know
  2. » How dumb can americans get?
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.36 seconds on 11/25/2009 at 08:52:11 Top End