@gungasnake,
To the victim - It was an ordeal.
To the perpetrators it was acceptable behaviour.
To an onlooker it is viewed by degree of altruistic self-relativty.
When you accuse one party of being dysfunctional - You, in turn, accuse all opposing parties as 'functional'.
Unfortunately, there is no 'universal' definition of 'functional'.
I was negatively affected by this story - Why? Because I envisioned it (Haven't seen visual-links - Don't wish to).
And, as ever, I instantly question my 'envisionings'.
Why the focus on one emotionally-evocative event, considering 2.5 million children will be sold, raped or beaten, starved or mentally abused....daily.
That's just under 8's.
Indeed, why the focus...
Orchestrated (Intentional) societal programming.
Now - There is a global response to this event - Media/fb/twitter, etc - Even on a2k, no doubt... Measured by views, by nation, creed, colour, religion, culural-disposition, height, age, sex..... ....
And each response directs the fashion by which the next (millions per day) emotionally-evocative envisionment is delivered.
Eat grass, go to trough and drink, eat grass, go to slaughterhouse...... Nice lamb stew.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace