mark noble
 
  0  
Mon 18 Jul, 2016 07:01 am
@TomTomBinks,
The proof is clear - 2014 & 2016 authentic pics from Nasa are identical, bar the cgi aurora painted on 2016.
mark noble
 
  0  
Tue 19 Jul, 2016 11:27 am
@mark noble,
QUOTE:

"The likelyhood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity to which others are trying to prove him wrong".
0 Replies
 
TomTomBinks
 
  2  
Tue 19 Jul, 2016 12:30 pm
@mark noble,
I will look at the photos and get back to you.
mark noble
 
  1  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 03:50 am
@TomTomBinks,
Thanks, Tom.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  0  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 04:35 am
@mark noble,
P*ss off, creep--i didn't tag this thread.
mark noble
 
  -1  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 04:39 am
@Setanta,
You posted a stupid pic on it though.
mark noble
 
  0  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 04:41 am
@mark noble,
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap140517.html

Official nasa photo, 2014.



http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-captures-vivvid-auroras-in-jupiter-s-atmosphere



http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/solar-storms-ignite-xray-northern-lights-on-jupiter.html
mark noble
 
  0  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 05:07 am
@mark noble,
The last link (Above) is from 2011 - Again IDENTICAL to the 2014 & 2016 images.

None of the features, storms/spot/belts have moved one inch.

The 2nd link is wrong (Misspelt 'vivid'.

Redo below.

http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/hubble-captures-vivid-auroras-in-jupiter-s-atmosphere/
TomTomBinks
 
  2  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 08:14 am
@mark noble,
Yes, the photos are identical. The image of the aurora is superimposed on an image of Jupiter taken in 2014. The aurora is only visible in ultraviolet, so the original photo was in black and white. Boring. The public want spectacular high definition color images. NASA simply showed the public what Jupiter would look like IF we could see the aurora with the naked eye. It makes for a better press release. I wish they wouldn't do things like that, it's misleading. Of course this doesn't prove that the Juno mission is fake. This doesn't even IMPLY that the Juno mission is fake.
Mark, I noticed that someone (you?) tagged this thread "Humor" Is that how it was intended? If so, I seem to have misunderstood you, I'm sorry.
mark noble
 
  0  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 08:26 am
@TomTomBinks,
I did not tag it as humour.
And the 2016 photos are (According to nasa) straight from hubble and official.
So says nasa.
Hubble.
Wiki.

Now the 2011 images are also identical to both.
Q: Are any of them real?
Q: Why do nasa claim they are each authentic?
Thanks for looking, Tom

0 Replies
 
mark noble
 
  0  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 10:22 am
@TomTomBinks,
Now - Here's the Cassini-shot from 2002.

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0212/jupiterIo_cassini_full.jpg

And it is the original shot all subsequent shots are cgi'd from.
Or - They are all false.

It would be far easier if I could paste the shots, directly, here... But I can'tSad
mark noble
 
  0  
Wed 20 Jul, 2016 11:37 am
@mark noble,
There is no doubt, to anyone with eyes - That the cassini image is all you ever see.
My only queery is - Is this image genuine or not.
nasa is syphoning the public purse straight into the elites' wallets - Has anything ever gone beyond the outer VA - Or does it just get fried en-route?
Who knows - Not even nasa employees know what's beyond their monitors, I guess.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Oddities and Humor - Discussion by edgarblythe
Let's play "Caption the Photo" II - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Funny Pictures ***Slow Loading*** - Discussion by JerryR
Caption The Cartoon - Discussion by panzade
Geek and Nerd Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Caption The Cartoon Part Deux - Discussion by panzade
IS IT OK FOR ME TO CHEAT? - Question by Setanta
2008 Election: Political Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Juno is Fake
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 04:01:09