Led Zeppelin not guilty of Plagiarism

I saw. I have been following Klausner because of the Axanar case.

I haven't followed it, but I'm relieved, while ignorant of the complexities.

I don't understand this case. How can they go after the band after so many decades? Why wouldn't a statute of limitations apply anyways?

I plead extreme ignorance.

As I recall, there has been a tolling provision carved out, with reference to who can sue when, in copyright law. What that means is, the statute begins to run (much like we see with medical malpractice, BTW) when the infringement is discovered, versus when the infringement occurred. I think once the Supreme Court is whole again, someone will push a case up to them to get them to weigh in.