0
   

Truth - the epistemology complications

Forums: Truth, Philosophy
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
SuzyAlsterics
 
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2015 03:49 pm
Could an anti-realist accommodate our intuitions about the objectivity of truth, do you think? And why are realist accounts of truth wedded to fallibilism?

Also do you accept the argument that simply opting for an anti-realist theory of truth will not enable one to evade the sceptical argument?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 1,380 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2015 05:47 pm
@SuzyAlsterics,
It is as it is.
0 Replies
 
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Nov, 2015 07:20 pm
@SuzyAlsterics,
Quote:
Could an anti-realist accommodate our intuitions .... do you think?
Why, Suzy, of course

Quote:
Accept... simply opting for an anti-realist ...not enable one to evade the sceptical argument?
/Without the slightest doubt
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Truth vs. Fact - Question by atchoo522
What is truth? - Question by Torii
The truth about life - Discussion by Rickoshay75
Can anyone refute this definition of 'truth'? - Discussion by The Pentacle Queen
The abusive use of the arguments against Logic and Truth - Discussion by Fil Albuquerque
Absolute truth? - Discussion by Hermod
Is truth subjective or objective? - Discussion by Taliesin181
Responsible Guilt or Guilty or Innocent - Discussion by MsKnowledgebased
Church vs Bible, What to believe? - Question by papag
Changing Beliefs.... Changing Experiences! - Discussion by NoName77
Philosophical Discussion About "Truth" - Question by NoName77
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Truth - the epistemology complications
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 10:19:21
▲ ▼