4
   

Steal? Steal what? Steal reputation?

 
 
Reply Sat 1 Aug, 2015 09:49 am

Context:

If you are right to believe that religious faith offers the only real basis for morality, then atheists should be less moral than believers. In fact, they should be utterly immoral. Are they? Do members of atheist organizations in the United States commit more than their fair share of violent crimes? Do the members of the National Academy of Sciences, 93 percent of whom reject the idea of God, lie and cheat and steal with abandon? We can be reasonably confident that these groups are at least as well behaved as the general population. And yet, atheists are the most reviled minority in the United States. Polls indicate that being an atheist is a perfect impediment to running for high office in our country (while being black, Muslim, or homosexual is not). Recently, crowds of thousands gathered throughout the Muslim world!aburning European embassies, issuing threas, taking hostages, even killing people!a in protest over twelve cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad that were first published in a Danish newspaper. When was the last atheist riot? Is there a newspaper anywhere on this earth that would hesitate to print cartoons about atheism for fear that its editors would be kidnapped or killed in reprisal?
 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
chai2
  Selected Answer
 
  4  
Reply Sat 1 Aug, 2015 09:53 am
@oristarA,
No. The writer means just plain stealing, thievery, taking something that doesn't belong to you, etc.

He's arguing against people who seem to think that you can only have morals or ethics if you believe in a god.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Aug, 2015 02:19 pm
@oristarA,
What made it difficult for you to understand?
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Aug, 2015 11:11 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

What made it difficult for you to understand?


Such insult against the distinguished members of the National Academy of Sciences is not conceivable.
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Sat 1 Aug, 2015 11:54 pm
@oristarA,
That's the point. It's inconceivable that such distinguished people would be assumed to be thieves simply because they aren't theists.

It would be an insult to think that they are, and the author is saying they are not.

In any event, it would be an insult to ANY human being to think they have no morals or ethics because they are atheists.
Tes yeux noirs
 
  2  
Reply Sun 2 Aug, 2015 01:37 am
@chai2,
Quote:
it would be an insult to ANY human being to think they have no morals or ethics because they are atheists.

It is likewise fatuous to imagine that deists have superior morals purely because of their belief.

0 Replies
 
Tes yeux noirs
 
  2  
Reply Sun 2 Aug, 2015 01:40 am
And what about people who struggle sincerely to believe, but can't quite manage it?
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Aug, 2015 01:45 am
@Tes yeux noirs,
Well, certainly, they're the worst of all.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Aug, 2015 11:08 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

Well, certainly, they're the worst of all.


You were forced to read Thomas Hardy as well?
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Aug, 2015 02:42 pm
@izzythepush,
Jude the Obscure was just devastating.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Aug, 2015 03:15 pm
@InfraBlue,
I had to read his poetry and Tess of the d'Urbervilles. That's a bloody depressing read.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Steal? Steal what? Steal reputation?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 02:43:52