When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

@revelette2,

Quote:

Re: bobsal u1553115 (Post 6252570)
Great lines, all true.

Usually these things are a bit gimmicky but this one is a good one.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote Finn:

Quote:

Good Lord...mark this moment. My comment has received three thumbs up. No doubt it will return to the negatives once the assh*les exercise their feeble will.

There's a chance you might be getting too emotionally involved in this place's rating system.

2 Replies

@RABEL222,

Ignore me then before you die.

1 Reply

@Blickers,

Are you unable to see sarcasm when it's presented?

1 Reply

@RABEL222,

Quote:

Re: Finn dAbuzz (Post 6252463)

Do not let him troll you.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote:

I'm sure the Foundation has sent money to worthy causes. Only an utter idiot in charge would not have. A question is how much money went to charities and how much went to administrative expenses.

Actually that question has been answered if you would ever bother to do research you would know.

Quote:

question is whether or not the donations bought favors from the Secretary of State.

The above was answered already, as of yet, going through all these emails, access was made, but no replies.

2 Replies

@revelette2,

Sez you, the Clinton adorant.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

Says the news. Go back a few pages and learn something for a change.

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Oooh take a look back. That post is now at zero.

Are you really going to suggest that there isn't a crew of leftwing assh*les who reflexively thumb down any post made by a perceived conservative, no matter the content?

I don't really care as I've gotten used to it as has, I'm sure, all of the conservatives who still post here.

Someone of integrity, in my belief, no matter what their political persuasion would speak out against it and not criticize those who are the subjects of these childish attacks, but, I guess that's you Blickers.

4 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote Finn:

Quote:

Are you unable to see sarcasm when it's presented?

No. But sarcasm requires concern in the first place.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote Finn:

Quote:

I don't really care as I've gotten used to it....Someone of integrity, in my belief, no matter what their political persuasion would speak out against it and not criticize those who are the subjects of these childish attacks, but, I guess that's you Blickers.

So if you don't care, why are you calling out for someone to support you against these markdowns? Make up your mind, if you don't care, you wouldn't complain.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Cant, lies attract my attention.

0 Replies

@revelette2,

OMG

The News has answered these questions?

This news?

http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/12/news/economy/clinton-foundation-charity-navigator/

http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/

Whatever they are, the Clintons aren't idiots. As soon as they were put on the Charity Navigator watch list they did whatever they had to do to get off.

I don't for a minute believe Clinton is the 21st Century's Hitler, but if she was, and she came to power it would be thanks to people like you who absolutely refuse to see anything, at all, wrong with her.

Is there anything that bothers you about her? Anything?

2 Replies

@maporsche,

By the way, I know you're concerned about campaign contributions... are you also concerned about the growing evidence of the play for pay politics surrounding Hillary Clintons tenure in the state department as evidenced by the release of information from the FBI?

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Quote Finn:

Quote:

The News has answered these questions?

This news?

http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/12/news/economy/clinton-foundation-charity-navigator/

From CNN:

Quote:

"The Clinton Foundation has multiple legal entities, and then also multiple disparate programs, which makes it impossible for us to rate in the actual format that we do ratings today," said Thatcher.

In order to rate it, Charity Navigator needs the Clinton Foundation to complete a form that includes all its operations, which is different than the combined financial materials it currently provides on its website., ...

....The Clinton Foundation does receive ratings from other charity evaluators. For example, Charity Watch rates the Clinton Foundation an "A" while Guidestar gives it a gold-level rating for transparency.

Charity Navigator put the Clinton Foundation on its "watchlist" in March 2015, after press reports raised questions about foreign donations to the Foundation while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. It removed the Clinton Foundation from the watchlist 9 months later, after the Foundation refiled four years of tax information and pledged other transparency measures.

So where's the scandal? They asked for more info, they got it, and now they are going to rate the foundation. Meanwhile, the other charity services are giving them great ratings. Where's the fire?

That's conservatives for you. All the Clintons have to do to make them scream "Scandal!" is to get up out of bed in the morning.

Remember that scandal when the Clintons supposedly took stuff out of the White House when they left that they weren't supposed to? Rack your brain, it's on that list of scandals somewhere. Turns out there is a civil servant who keeps charge of these things. He said everything they did was okay and by the rules. Did that stop the conservatives from screaming bloody blue murder for months about it? Hell no. And so it goes.

1 Reply

@Finn dAbuzz,

I am not talking about the whole conspiracy theories with the Clinton foundation, merely the question of whether Hillary used her position as secretary of state to give favors of donors to the foundation. So far going through tons of emails, they have found access but not favors.

And yes there are a lot of things I don't like about Clinton which is why I didn't vote for her in 2008. She is not balanced with both Palestinians and Israel and she is more hawkish than Obama.

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Here is the 2015 Clinton Foundation Financial Statements. All nonprofits are required to make their financial statements open to the public.
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/sites/default/files/2015_ar_2015financials_upd.pdf

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Quote:

No, racialist is what stupid people say when they mean racist. In Britain at least.

You are so cruel on yourself at times!

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

HOWEVER, I believe that the Clinton Foundation is a highly respected one.

It is amazing what a belief can make us think is true at times.

0 Replies

@Finn dAbuzz,

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Oooh take a look back. That post is now at zero.

You're seriously citing a post's popularity as a measure of its credibility?

You're approaching Lash-levels of stupidity, now. Save yourself, before it's too late.

2 Replies

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know