contrex
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Apr, 2015 11:17 am
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Quote:
I noticed a remark earlier that the French army was the only one in which mutinies occurred in World War 1.
Where ? Post the ref.

Your post http://able2know.org/topic/274450-3#post-5937158

Quote:
All nations in WW1 had incompetent officers, only the French mutinied .



Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Apr, 2015 08:31 pm
@contrex,
Thank you for pointing that out, I was in error . I meant to say, only the French had such large scale mutinies . There were minor mutinies from all sides .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 24 Apr, 2015 08:35 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
I wouldn't want to catch AIDS
So you take it up the arse from all those males but you are worried about AIDS ? Bit late for that isnt it ? Shouldnt you worry more about national traits, like cowardice, corruption, arrogance ?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Fri 24 Apr, 2015 09:47 pm
Do you know what our little French Fool said when I reminded it of the rainbow warrior ?

"So what ? Everybody knows about the Rainbow Warrior ."

So if everyone knows, it isnt an act of war ! This is the degree of stupidity I have been putting up with from our little French Fagot .
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2015 07:45 am
@Ionus,
Talking to yourself, Ioio?

So that's what you're left with, huh? The Rainbow Warrior... And that's what I predicted to you that you would be left with. All your other claims crumbled, as I said they would...

I feel bad about the RW, always have. But which country never made any mistake?
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Apr, 2015 08:28 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
But which country never made any mistake?
Countries always make mistakes, I objected to your attitude that I was a liar because France never made a mistake . You are the typical little cowardly arrogant French buffoon .

Does the Exocet ad exist or not ?
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 07:41 am
@Ionus,
You're a liar because you spread lies, that's all.

As for the exocet ad, the burden of proof is on you. So far you got indications that an ad was published 2 years after the Falklands war. So your allegation of an ad published during the war remains unproven.

But you realized that, you little racist ****. You're just trying to save your skin by lying your way out of this.
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 07:48 am
@Olivier5,
Have you seen Antartica ? Maybe it doesnt exist . Does the ad exist or not, you French fagot ! You have called me names to save the honour of your Glorious France, a country that specialises in surrender . Nothing glorious about it . Now admit you were a dickhead for calling me a liar or prove I lied ! Does the ad exist or not ?
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 07:50 am
@Ionus,
What ad are you talking about, ****?
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 08:07 am
@Olivier5,
Very Happy I think we have established you as a liar, a coward who cant admit when he is wrong, and an arrogant little **** . What do you think others have made of your childish and silly attempts to save face ? Have you convinced anyone else these things never happened or are they laughing at you, my little froggy homosexual friend ?
Olivier5
 
  0  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 08:33 am
@Ionus,
Your ad was published two years after the Falklands war, hence you lied. Period.
Ionus
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 08:36 am
@Olivier5,
Ah ! The ad does exist .
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 08:50 am
@Ionus,
Not the one you talked about, though...
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 08:53 am
To prove someone is a liar, you have to prove :
1. They knew what they were saying
2. They said it of their own free will
3. They knew what they said was totally incorrect factually

Being the astute little lying **** you are, you might notice that it is very difficult to prove because people make mistakes of memory . Whereas I had some details wrong, I was substantially correct in everything even though I quoted from memory .

You on the other hand, when presented with obvious facts, chose to continue to call me a liar when you knew I was substantially telling the truth . You continued to deny facts that were evident . You are a liar . I am not .
Olivier5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Apr, 2015 11:14 am
@Ionus,
You are still a liar, since you misrepresented that ad as being published during the war, and that point was crucial. Otherwise, you have no beef. What's inherently wrong with publishing an ad in the Economist? Nothing. It's done all the time...

You are just another liar, Ioio; just another idiot; just another racist. Case closed.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2015 10:49 pm
Dear Orifice5fingers
your xenophobia will continue so long as you imagine all criticism to be race based . I showed you how, by definition, I am not a liar but you are...clearly you dont like facts . Like the complete insensitivity of that ad . If there was nothing wrong with it why was it withdrawn ? Why did it lie about the number of ships sunk by the exocet ? Do you really think it was in good taste ? Of course you have the foul mouth and arrogance we have come to expect from the worst of the French but at least you can claim you are a minority .
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2015 11:11 pm
Despite being saved in two World Wars by English speaking peoples, France has tried very hard to eliminate English from its people and promote French instead . These are just some interesting snippets:

1 . A TV show with children selecting French sounding names to replace the English language names of inventions .

2. After the Rainbow Warrior, France paid a portion of the cost of any ad or product in Australia or New Zealand that promoted the French language or showed France in a positive light .

3. Despite being only 1/5th of the population of Canada, French Canadians insist on all signs and instructions being in both French and English .

4. When films promoting the English speaking world are to be released in France, there is considerable money to give them a lousy sounding French name so they will be less popular . "Breaker Morant" was translated to the French version of "Bastards and Heroes" .

5. Modern English is closer to Medieval French than Modern French is .

6. Competition is a dirty word in France . Industries, especially the film and TV industry, are heavily protected and subsidised . The introduction of NETFLIX really ruffled feathers as it raised fears that it will erode the French “cultural exception”. Governmental opposition to Netflix was removed last month when François Hollande purged left-wing rebels from his government .

The French paranoia about their loss of empire, their cowardice in WW1 and WW2, their frightened stance on their language, and all their fears coming out as arrogance are what I see in this thread .
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2015 11:22 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Modern English is closer to Medieval French than Modern French is .
That is a very interesting opinion.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2015 11:26 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Despite being saved in two World Wars by English speaking peoples, France has tried very hard to eliminate English from its people and promote French instead .
How many and what foreign languages are taught compulsory in e.g.Australia as opposed to France? And from what age onwards, as opposed e.g. to France?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Apr, 2015 11:55 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
4. When films promoting the English speaking world are to be released in France, there is considerable money to give them a lousy sounding French name so they will be less popular . "Breaker Morant" was translated to the French version of "Bastards and Heroes".
Héros ou Salopards actually is the French title of that film. The French word for "bastard" is bâtard ... "Modern English is closer to Medieval French than Modern French is", you know.

The film has been releases in the Netherlands under the German title "Der Fall des Lieutnant Morant", btw. (With Dutch subtitles)
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 01:18:22