2
   

never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it

 
 
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 11:13 am
Does "never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it" mean "never produced such a villain as the villain who could be capable of entertaining it"?

Context:

The most frivolous disaster which could befall himself would occasion a more real disturbance. If he was to lose his little finger to-morrow, he would not sleep to-night; but, provided he never saw them, he will snore with the most profound security over the ruin of a hundred millions of his brethren, and the destruction of that immense multitude seems plainly an object less interesting to him, than this paltry misfortune of his own. To prevent, therefore, this paltry misfortune to himself, would a man of humanity be willing to sacrifice the lives of a hundred millions of his brethren, provided he had never seen them? Human nature startles with horror at the thought, and the world, in its greatest depravity and corruption, never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 470 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 01:08 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

Does "never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it" mean "never produced such a villain as the villain who could be capable of entertaining it"?


Yes.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 03:47 pm
@oristarA,

Quote:
never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it.


Yes (also)

It is a shortened phrase: never produced such a villain as (him who) could be capable of entertaining it.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 06:29 pm
@oristarA,
I think that is what Adam Smith thought.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jan, 2015 09:00 pm
Thank you all guys.

BTW, I didn't get "The most frivolous disaster which could befall himself" well. Does it mean "The most trivial/minor disaster which would trouble him "?
McTag
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 08:01 am
@McTag,
Quote:
It is a shortened phrase: never produced such a villain as (him who) could be capable of entertaining it.


I think I would like to change that: it is an awkward phrase certainly, and I believe the pronoun should be in the nominative case, thus:

It is a shortened phrase: never produced such a villain as (he who) could be capable of entertaining it.

Sorry.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 12:00 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

Thank you all guys.

BTW, I didn't get "The most frivolous disaster which could befall himself" well. Does it mean "The most trivial/minor disaster which would trouble him "?


Who would like to answer this?
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 12:33 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:
BTW, I didn't get "The most frivolous disaster which could befall himself" well. Does it mean "The most trivial/minor disaster which would trouble him "?


Yes.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » never produced such a villain as could be capable of entertaining it
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.61 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 05:37:46