1 in 5 women get raped?

Of course when the state was about to execute men who had have 20 years plus of appeals and was found guilty by not one jury but by two juries of murders his position was that I was wrong in not supporting another delay for some more DNA testings.

but agree with Hawkeye that nailing your wife's tits to a piece of 2 by 4 is totally normal.

Quote:

but agree with Hawkeye that nailing your wife's tits to a piece of 2 by 4 is totally normal.

????????????????????

What two consenting people do between themselves is almost never anyone elses business, to include the government. If a woman is OK with her man nailing her tits to a board then so be it, it is not anybodies business.

I am not aware of the case or thread in question, but given the way our justice system often rubber-stamps the conviction of innocent people, it is always a good idea to allow such reviews.

Come on Bill, you know what Izzy is about. This is the actual quote written by me

Quote:

What two consenting people do between themselves is almost never anyone elses business, to include the government. If a woman is OK with her man nailing her tits to a board then so be it, it is not anybodies business.

the guy who talks his woman into letting him nail her tits to a board is not, he is normal.

If you control and manipulate someone enough you can coerce them into almost anything. That's not the same as consent.

Quote:

What two consenting people do between themselves is almost never anyone elses business, to include the government. If a woman is OK with her man nailing her tits to a board then so be it, it is not anybodies business.

BillRM ("R" for "rapey"), hawkeye10, and nononono don't care. They just don't care. They hate rape victims and want to silence them. They're devoid of empathy.

I love the username "nononono." That's what the girls say to him!

Is that why you take issue with the phrase “unwanted sexual advances”?

It’s such an issue on campuses, and my campus in particular. At the time I was writing the book, dating was still permitted between professors and students, but you were not supposed to make “unwanted sexual advances.” I went to this workshop and asked, “How are you supposed to know if the advance is unwanted until you try it?” And there was no answer to that. It’s just a conundrum, a contradiction in terms. A flier got passed around calling all the students who had pressed charges against professors “survivors.” This was regardless of how merit-worthy their individual cases were, so the language has a kind of hysteria to it.

If what you’re saying is true, why are women still so afraid of male power? Where’s the disconnect?

Well, there are still horrific levels of violence against women. But I do think the way in which second-wave feminism has focused on women’s vulnerability as an essential property of women has not been that great. There’s a lot of violence in the world and most of it is directed against men. Yet women feel themselves at their core, to be vulnerable, in ways that don’t entirely map onto the reality.

Do you think there’s a different direction feminism should be taking?

I tend to feel pretty distant from what people call feminism at the moment. It’s often about the moral high grounding of men, and that often means taking fairly conservative positions and not going for the radical politics. The most radical thing anyone could do now in terms of feminism is insisting on child care as a social entitlement. But instead we hear a lot about how men shouldn’t be allowed to use the word “boobs” in public. Women are charged with being the moral correctives on men, the cultural superego, and I definitely can’t fall into that role. I just kind of loathe it—it’s a why do I have to be the responsible one kind of thing?