17
   

I saw a white man with a gun. I heard a policeman saying, "Place the weapon down on the ground, ple

 
 
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2014 11:14 pm
Looks like some legislators recognize the problem:

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/215160-lawmaker-drafting-bill-to-stem-flow-of-tanks-and-m16s-to-police

Quote:
Lawmaker drafting bill to demilitarize local police

By Mario Trujillo and Jesse Byrnes - 08/14/14 01:58 PM EDT

A Democratic congressman from Georgia is drafting legislation to limit a Pentagon program that provides surplus military equipment to local law enforcement.

Rep. Hank Johnson is pushing the legislation amid the situation in Ferguson, Mo., where an armed police presence has taken to the streets after mass protests over a police shooting.

"Our main streets should be a place for business, families, and relaxation, not tanks and M16s," Johnson wrote in a Dear Colleague letter sent Thursday to other members of Congress.
“As the tragedy in Missouri unfolds, one thing is clear. Our local police are becoming militarized,” Johnson's office said in a statement.

Johnson said he will introduce the bill in September, when Congress returns from a five-week recess. He has been worked on the legislation for months, but his office said the current situation highlights the need for the bill.

Police have been out in force in Ferguson following the death of Michael Brown, a black teenager who was unarmed when he was shot by a police officer during a street confrontation.

The images coming out of Ferguson — which President Obama on Thursday called “deeply disturbing” — have spurred comparisons with a war zone, with heavily armed police officers pointing weapons at protesters. Some of the protesters have reportedly thrown Molotov cocktails at police.

"Is this a war zone or a US city?" Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) tweeted Wednesday evening, as reports emerged of police using smoke bombs and tear gas to disperse crowds.

Johnson criticized the Pentagon's '1033' program, which offers surplus military equipment to state and local law enforcement, including M16 rifles and mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles (MRAP).

He noted in the last several months those vehicles have been given to cities in Texas, Idaho, Indiana, Minnesota, New York, South Carolina, Tennessee, Arizona, Illinois and Alabama.

"This trend is not only sweeping America's small cities, it's hitting American college campuses as well. Ohio State University recently acquired an MRAP," he said. "Apparently, college kids are getting too rowdy."

Johnson said his bill would limit the type of equipment that could be transferred and would make sure states track all equipment received.

Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson on Thursday pushed back on criticism of the police response.

"The whole picture is being painted a little bit sideways from what's happening," Jackson said.

"It's not military, it's tactical operations. It's SWAT teams. That's who's out there — police. We're doing this in blue."

Ferguson Mayor James Knowles similarly defended police conduct, telling MSNBC he could not "second guess these officers."

Lawmakers aren’t convinced and are increasingly sounding the alarm about the new firepower being wielded by police departments.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a contender for the GOP nomination in 2016, on Thursday penned an op-ed for Time magazine blaming Washington for “using federal dollars to help municipal governments build what are essentially small armies.”

"There is a legitimate role for the police to keep the peace, but there should be a difference between a police response and a military response," Paul wrote. "Not surprisingly, big government has been at the heart of the problem."

Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) on Thursday said the police response seen in Ferguson “has become the problem instead of the solution.”

McCaskill said that while she respected police working to provide safety, "my constituents are allowed to have peaceful protests, and the police need to respect that right and protect that right."

Obama said Thursday that "there is never an excuse for violence against police" but added that there was "no excuse for police to use excessive force."
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2014 11:59 pm
@FBM,
Quote:
hyperbolic

Funny you should use that word...(you do know what it means, right?)
Quote:
grenade launchers GRACIE????
Now whos exagerating? You're implying that these are the type that propel HE...but of course we in the know know that they are the variety that propel TEAR GAS and FLASH BANG greandes...NOT the ones that go boom w/ shrapnel. But of course it serves the HYPERBOLIC nature of position doent it? BTW, the police have always had grenade launchers even in the old days...ever since they had tear gas.


So you want statistics? I got plenty...we can start with the cops who were shot down that I knew personally and work from there.
FBM
 
  2  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 12:31 am
@giujohn,
Let's have a look at some facts, then:

Quote:
Before the turn of the millennium, the West Springfield Police Department received two M79 grenade launchers and seven M14 rifles through a Department of Defense program.


http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2014/07/aclu_calls_into_question_why_w.html


Quote:
The M79 grenade launcher is a single-shot, shoulder-fired, break-action grenade launcher that fires a 40x46mm grenade which uses what the US Army calls the High-Low Propulsion System to keep recoil forces low, and first appeared during the Vietnam War. Because of its distinctive report, it has earned the nicknames of "Thumper", "Thump-Gun", "Bloop Tube", and "Blooper" among American soldiers;[1] Australian units referred to it as the "Wombat Gun".[2] The M79 can fire a wide variety of 40 mm rounds, including explosive, anti-personnel, smoke, buckshot, flechette, and illumination. While largely replaced by the M203,[3] the M79 has remained in service in many units worldwide in niche roles.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M79_grenade_launcher

Quote:
So you want statistics? I got plenty...we can start with the cops who were shot down that I knew personally and work from there.


You don't seem to know the difference between anecdotes and statistics. I'll leave you to Google that one.
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 04:37 am
@FBM,
Quote:
The M79 grenade launcher is a single-shot, shoulder-fired, break-action grenade launcher that fires a 40x46mm grenade which uses what the US Army calls the High-Low Propulsion System to keep recoil forces low, and first appeared during the Vietnam War. Because of its distinctive report, it has earned the nicknames of "Thumper", "Thump-Gun", "Bloop Tube", and "Blooper" among American soldiers;[1] Australian units referred to it as the "Wombat Gun".[2] The M79 can fire a wide variety of 40 mm rounds, including explosive, anti-personnel, smoke, buckshot, flechette, and illumination. While largely replaced by the M203,[3] the M79 has remained in service in many units worldwide in niche roles.



I am quite familar with the M79. And it will fire CS rounds and rubber bullets. Where is your evidence that the PD had HE rounds for it? You're being ridiculous and dramatic for affect. No PD would use HE from a M79. The liability factor would preclude it. The one use of a bomb I can remember was on the radical MOVE group in Philly 30 years ago...and the city had to pay out $1.5 mil. Police depts. dont have HE for there weapons. Thats a fact. So stop trying to inflame the discourse with this bullshit.

Quote:
You don't seem to know the difference between anecdotes and statistics.


I dont consider the death of police officers anecdotal. They are statistics; cold hard facts. But your agenda is to patently obvious. You hate the police and have no regard for their saftey. If they are gunned down it is unimportant to you. You are only concerned with any black man regardless of his criminal intent or actions who is shot by police. Because in your mind ALL police are racists who are always looking to kill a black man for any reason. To a reasonable person that sounds strange...to you it is normal.
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 04:47 am
@giujohn,
Quote:
No PD would use HE from a M79.


And no PO would shoot an unarmed, peaceful citizen to death. No PO would violate a citizen's constitutional rights, no PO would beat a handcuffed suspect to a pulp, then charge the suspect with assault, etc etc.

Give them the hammer and they will come up with some excuse to use it. They already fabricate threats to justify going to serve a simple warrant in full military combat gear in APC's. "To a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail."

Quote:
an·ec·dote
ˈanikˌdōt/Submit
noun
a short and amusing or interesting story about a real incident or person.
"told anecdotes about his job"
synonyms: story, tale, narrative, incident; More
an account regarded as unreliable or hearsay.
"his wife's death has long been the subject of rumor and anecdote"
the depiction of a minor narrative incident in a painting.


Quote:
sta·tis·tic
stəˈtistik/Submit
noun
1.
a fact or piece of data from a study of a large quantity of numerical data.
"the statistics show that the crime rate has increased"
Buttermilk
 
  3  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 08:17 am
I'm not anti-cop but law enforcement is just another gang to me.....

Cops get to drink and drive and when another cop pulls another cop over for a DUI stop they get escorts home. Cops can racial profile you but call it investigation. Cops can pull a pistol on you off duty because you piss them off in traffic but if you do it, it's a felony. Police aren't really held accountable for their actions because of the ole' "atta boy" system.
revelette2
 
  2  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 10:30 am
@Buttermilk,
I see a lot of generalization going on here in this thread. Perhaps it is time to reform the police system, but not all cops are as those you describe, surely?
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 03:57 pm
@revelette2,
Certainly not. I made a point a few pages back that not all cops are like that. The problem that most of us see is that far too many cops are like that, not necessarily all of them. It doesn't take many killings and beatings of unarmed, non-violent citizens to be considered too many. Many of the stats I've found are downright scary. And I don't see how militarizing the local police forces with weapons of all-out war is going to solve the problem. While not all cops are so brutal, it is clear that the police have adopted the military's attitude of overwhelming force, ofen even when they are engaging people in non-violent situations. In many of the videos I've seen, cops are using 9/11 as an excuse to violate people's constitutional rights and liberties. Seriously, I don't think Mayberry is overrun with Taliban quite yet.
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 03:58 pm
@FBM,
Quote:
simple warrant


Please define a simple warrant. (this should be good)
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 04:01 pm
@giujohn,
The kind where they used to just walk up to your door and knock in order to serve it.
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 04:02 pm
@Buttermilk,
Quote:
I'm not anti-cop but law enforcement is just another gang to me.....


You're not anti-cop but all law enforcement is a gang (negative conotation). Absolutely amazing!
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 04:16 pm
From a cop forum:

A: "Okay, I've heard several generic and "sketchy" answers to this, but can somebody please give me a definition of what "The Thin Blue Line" really means to you?"

B: "ITS what separates us from them.

Kinda hard to explain, but police work is a brotherhood. We have to stick together NO MATTER WHAT!!"

C: "Quote Originally Posted by scooterlee
ITS what separates us from them.

Kinda hard to explain, but police work is a brotherhood. We have to stick together NO MATTER WHAT!!
ditto....."

http://forums.officer.com/t36224/
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2014 04:24 pm
"conotation" [sic] is a big word for someone who just learned the definitions of "anecdote" and "statistics." Heehee...
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Sep, 2014 10:36 am
@FBM,
If what you are saying is true, it is indeed something that needs to corrected and the sooner the better. Maybe people are not aware and just think it is the occasional excessive bad cop when we see the headlines.

I really don't know, live in a very rural county, my particular "city" don't even have a store and is a couple of roads long before hitting another "city" the whole don't amount to much. If you want to go to a decent shopping without going to the local downtown (very pretty) over priced shops, you have to at least drive an hour or so away. Good thing for the internet. My point is, the cops I know, a few are over eager, some seem a little corrupt, but some are very caring and nice. It does seem to have more arrest in the more run down parts of town over things that might get a pass somewhere else.
FBM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Sep, 2014 03:20 pm
@revelette2,
I grew up in a place very much like what you describe. I loved the location, but unfortunately most of the people there were uneducated hicks. Anyway, I guess wherever you have a lower population density, the less you encounter any kind of behavior, good or bad. I suspect that most of the militaristic police departments are located in and around larger urban centers. In Small Town, USA, I think cops are more willing to talk to you without immediately going into "overwhelming force" mode. But even so, that doesn't excuse any cop anywhere from shooting or beating unarmed, peaceful people. And whatever the urban environment, it doesn't justify turning the police into soldiers. We are not the enemy.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2014 03:02 pm
@FBM,
Quote:
The kind where they used to just walk up to your door and knock in order to serve it.


And I take it that the warrant has a statement somewhere in it saying,"Dear Police Officer, We are ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE that this miscreant/scofflaw/violent felon has the utmost respect for law enforcement and will by no means be hostile torwards you or attempt to resist or take your life during the execution of this warrant. In fact you do not need to load your weapon or bring along any defensive weapons. WE GUARANTEE YOUR SAFTEY!!!"
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2014 03:22 pm
@FBM,
Quote:
I've got some. (statistics) Crimes rates - including violent crimes rates - have been falling dramatically over the past decade.



FBI: Sharp rise in active shooter events since 2006, ASEs have tripled.

Many ASE sites involve open spaces or long hallways that create engagement distances beyond the ability of most officers to effectively engage a suspect with a pistol. Add this to the possibility that the officers may have to place precision fire on a suspect while avoiding hitting fleeing or injured victims, and the need for patrol rifles is clear. Additionally, about a quarter of attackers are armed with rifles. (at Columbine they have IEDs) Officers ought to have firepower at least equivalent to what they will face if they go in harm’s way.


Yup...lets do away with those nasty military looking swat teams and the traning.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2014 03:26 pm
@giujohn,
Yeah, let's simply increase the number of people carrying guns too.

You forgot to mention that the police stopped very few of the active shooter incidents.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2014 03:31 pm
@parados,
Why is that?

They have to get on the scene before they could respond. Most police response times are an average of 2-5 minutes for the soonest response time. Most of the time the shootings were already over by the time the police arrived.

Did you see the COO of a company who carried at work and stopped the crazy guy from taking more people's heads?
parados
 
  2  
Reply Fri 26 Sep, 2014 03:32 pm
@Baldimo,
Yeah.. if only the police had more military equipment they could get there faster. </sarcasm>
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 06:55:30