14
   

Fergusonj shooting, autopsy in, all shots from front

 
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:21 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
whitehouse.com is a porn site.


The real WH is just as obscene and perverse.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:23 pm
@Baldimo,
Actually it isn't 3% since the 67% is ALL single parent households.

This is what Pinkie said:
Quote:
Then why let the fact that over 70% of black families don't have fathers bother you?


Notice he says OVER 70%. The actual number without a father is not OVER 70%. It isn't over 65% and it's questionable whether it is over 60%. It all depends on which numbers you are using for the percent of black single parent families that have only a male parent. If blacks are similar to whites in single parent fathers/mothers. I guess if we just assume Pinkie didn't mean what he said then I would have missed the point.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:25 pm
@Baldimo,
Yeah and? White single parent families are close to 50% (if we use your allowance for not being too accurate.)
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:30 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Yeah and? White single parent families are close to 50% (if we use your allowance for not being too accurate.)


And look has what happened. There is no more respect for family. There is big government being daddy and mommy doling out allowance and covering for criminals by manufacturing racism that just isn't there.

And let's not forget the lowlifes that support the countries decline, like Parados.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:34 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:





And let's not forget the lowlifes that support the countries decline, like Parados.


Yeah, cuz students today just ain't edjimicated like you is.




(I wonder if you will even be able to find your grammatical error.)
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:37 pm
@parados,
I see your point about using "over 70%" is wrong and misleading. I was refering to the # I have heard that rounded to 70%. 3% isn't much for generalizations and polls use the +/- 3 to 4%. Do you find rounding in those cases acceptable?

Here is this from Rev's article.
Quote:
In all but eleven states, most black children do not live with both parents. In every state, 70 percent of white children do. In all but two states, most Hispanic children do.


Rounding isn't your strong point is it?
parados
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:41 pm
@Baldimo,
Fathers vs mothers isn't your strong suit it seems.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:44 pm
@parados,
Quote:
Yeah, cuz students today just ain't edjimicated like you is.


I don't use what education I have to lie to people or support the decline of this country, you do. And grammar is not going to save this country. Not listening to Shills like you will.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:45 pm
@parados,
I said single family homes is in the high 60% range. I'm not wrong in that respect am I?
revelette2
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 01:53 pm
@Baldimo,
You are wrong in the respect that coldwhatever said 70% of black families are without fathers which is what started this line of debate. Turns out 70% is wrong because 10% of those families are without mothers rather than fathers.
revelette2
 
  3  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 02:11 pm
@coldjoint,
Considering those in red states (states which usually goes republican) are states which receive the most public assistance, I would say, it is the republicans who support the decline of the country according to your logic. Moreover, whites are catching up to blacks for families without two parents in a household.

The point to all this is that rather than being judgmental, why not find solutions to problems of poverty and single parents? Perhaps the issue of gangs and poverty needs to addressed.

Not sure what all this has to with Brown. Do we even know if he belonged to a gang and if he only lived with his mother and his father not part of his life?
coldjoint
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 02:16 pm
@revelette2,
Quote:
The point to all this is that rather than being judgmental, why not find solutions to problems of poverty and single parents? Perhaps the issue of gangs and poverty needs to addressed.


The solution is in the Black community. They need to start taking responsibility for themselves and teach it to their children.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 02:40 pm
@revelette2,
Screw CJ or BF or whatever it is this week. MY statement stands... Single family homes in the black community are at the high 60% range and could be rounded to 70%.

Compare that to Parados bad rounding that said that 50% of white families are single parent families when the article said that 70% of them were not in single family homes.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 04:05 pm
@coldjoint,
Your usual chicken shyt answer when bested in your bull shyt facts.
coldjoint
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 08:57 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Your usual chicken shyt answer when bested in your bull shyt facts.


The fact still remains only blacks can turn this around. Not mealy mouthed non posters like yourself.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Tue 2 Sep, 2014 09:19 pm
@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:

gungasnake wrote:
Trayvon Martin was not "racially profiled(TM)" He was ASSHOLEY profiled. If he hadn't been acting, dressing, and conducting himself like an asshole, he'd be alive today.

I heard of the term "fashion police", but wasn't aware they were authorized
to inflict capital punishment on the spot.
Martin was guilty of homicidally violent demeanor.
He got what he deserved. If a white had done the same thing
(slamming an innocent fellow 's head on the cement), then he 'd deserve the same result.

I 'm comfortable with flipping the racial polarity:
if a malicious white were pounding an innocent black's head on the street,
then I 'd deem it fine for the black to kill the white with gunfire.
We 'd all be better off without that white.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Wed 3 Sep, 2014 12:03 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
NO, Gunga. Zimmerman got out of his car and followed Martin
almost certainly because of Martin's skin color.

But you will never acknowledge that...so be it as it may.
Frank, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING rong with doing that.
IF u claim that there IS, then please quote the operative language
of whatever law it IS that u allege is violated by so doing. I await.



Frank Apisa wrote:
And Zimmerman was the victim of his own rashness.
A young man who was being followed...probably menacingly...
How do u define that menace,
and HOW have u calculated the PROBABILITY that u mentioned?????
I 'm glad no one wants ME to figure those odds;
I have no idea of how I 'd even begin to do that,
but from your post, we know that u have ALREADY executed that calculation,
since u have already given us the result.






Frank Apisa wrote:
and he turned to defend himself from the threat.
What 's this about a "threat", Frank???
Where do u get anything about a "threat"????


Frank Apisa wrote:
If George Zimmerman had stayed where he was supposed to stay...
"supposed" by WHOM, Frank??
Did Zimmy have any DUTY
to bring into actuality any person's SUPPOSITIONS???
IF u allege that he had such a duty,
then please tell us the SOURCE of it, if u will be so kind?????


Frank Apisa wrote:
where he was advised to stay...
Do u mean the advice from the telefone operator????????
Will u reveal unto us the jurisdictional authority
of telefone operators???? Is that in the Constitution?? Inquiring minds wanna know.



Frank Apisa wrote:
he would not have bumped his head on the concrete
when Martin tried to defend himself from what he perceived as a threat.
The delusions of a homicidal maniac (meaning decedent)
have no effect upon the rights of a citizen to walk or to drive
in his own naborhood and to be alert to what is happening there
and to call his employees, the police, if he sees fit, as indeed, he DID.

Zimmy woud have been perfectly within his rights
to tell 3 police and 7 FBI agents that he was going walking
or driving thru his naborhood and being alert for anything
happening there, for reference to police, in his discretion.
Indeed, if he saw A WHITE breaking a window n crawling in,
he coud rightfully complain of it to police. He has the same right
to complain against the blacks. IF u deny that, then please logically JUSTIFY your denial
and cite to any statutory or judicial authority in support of your position.





David
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Sep, 2014 03:26 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
NO, Gunga. Zimmerman got out of his car and followed Martin
almost certainly because of Martin's skin color.

But you will never acknowledge that...so be it as it may.
Frank, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING rong with doing that.
IF u claim that there IS, then please quote the operative language
of whatever law it IS that u allege is violated by so doing. I await.



Frank Apisa wrote:
And Zimmerman was the victim of his own rashness.
A young man who was being followed...probably menacingly...
How do u define that menace,
and HOW have u calculated the PROBABILITY that u mentioned?????
I 'm glad no one wants ME to figure those odds;
I have no idea of how I 'd even begin to do that,
but from your post, we know that u have ALREADY executed that calculation,
since u have already given us the result.






Frank Apisa wrote:
and he turned to defend himself from the threat.
What 's this about a "threat", Frank???
Where do u get anything about a "threat"????


Frank Apisa wrote:
If George Zimmerman had stayed where he was supposed to stay...
"supposed" by WHOM, Frank??
Did Zimmy have any DUTY
to bring into actuality any person's SUPPOSITIONS???
IF u allege that he had such a duty,
then please tell us the SOURCE of it, if u will be so kind?????


Frank Apisa wrote:
where he was advised to stay...
Do u mean the advice from the telefone operator????????
Will u reveal unto us the jurisdictional authority
of telefone operators???? Is that in the Constitution?? Inquiring minds wanna know.



Frank Apisa wrote:
he would not have bumped his head on the concrete
when Martin tried to defend himself from what he perceived as a threat.
The delusions of a homicidal maniac (meaning decedent)
have no effect upon the rights of a citizen to walk or to drive
in his own naborhood and to be alert to what is happening there
and to call his employees, the police, if he sees fit, as indeed, he DID.

Zimmy woud have been perfectly within his rights
to tell 3 police and 7 FBI agents that he was going walking
or driving thru his naborhood and being alert for anything
happening there, for reference to police, in his discretion.
Indeed, if he saw A WHITE breaking a window n crawling in,
he coud rightfully complain of it to police. He has the same right
to complain against the blacks. IF u deny that, then please logically JUSTIFY your denial
and cite to any statutory or judicial authority in support of your position.
David


David, I disagree with everything you said here except for the word "Frank" in your first sentence.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 3 Sep, 2014 07:18 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Yeah, cuz students today just ain't edjimicated like you is.


I don't use what education I have to lie to people or support the decline of this country, you do. And grammar is not going to save this country. Not listening to Shills like you will.

You use your lack of education.

As I predicted, you didn't recognize your grammatical mistake.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 3 Sep, 2014 07:21 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

I said single family homes is in the high 60% range. I'm not wrong in that respect am I?


If you want to switch to single family homes then the US Census lists detached homes as 60% of housing.
https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 09:26:27