kev wrote:
Quote:Greyfan, you mean there was actually a point to Jacobs Ladder, please tell the rest of us that thought it was just pretentious crap.
I could, but that would involve giving away the twist...
I checked some reviews at mrqe.com, and they appeared to be very mixed.
Roger Ebert states it is "powerfully written, directed and acted".
John Nesbit at Culture Dose writes: "I realize some people have found profound spiritual meaning in Jacob's Ladder, while others are still trying to figure out what they've seen. How you react will depend on your own spiritual and film experiences.
Some will absolutely hate Jacob's Ladder; others will love it. It depends on how willing you are to get on Lyne's roller coaster, descend to Dante's Inferno, and ascend to something akin to What Dreams May Come. It's a worthwhile journey, expertly crafted."
(For the record, "What Dreams May Come" is my idea of pretentious crap.)
Sean Caszatt adds: "To label Jacob's Ladder as a horror film does it an immense disservice. Jacob's Ladder is a psychological/philosophical thriller/drama. How's that for a label? Actually, it still doesn't do the film justice.
...It's a film that is likely to provoke your thoughts on perception and life and death. It's not a film for everyone."
Of course a movie could both have a point AND be pretentious crap, and maybe that's the case here.
My experience may have been more positive because I knew going in what the director was doing. My wife, on the other hand, was thoroughly confused with the whole thing. Without the benefit of foreknowledge, my reaction probably would have been the same.
To say more would be unfair to Craven.