Death penalty for "aspostasy" in Sudan

So I ask, again, why do liberals give Islamic Shariah law virtually a free pass?

Here are the possibilities:

They’re afraid of the consequences;

they’re commitment to the multiculturalist falsehood that all cultures are equal trumps their commitment to liberty, tolerance and free expression;
they are completely ignorant of the oppressive nature of Shariah law and death-cult qualities of Islamic fundamentalism;
they are too busy criticizing their own country and Israel to get sidetracked with the loathsome conditions in Saudi Arabia and other parts of the Islamic world.

Am I missing anything?

Apparently, liberals also fail to notice who are generally the first victims of Shariah law when it overtakes a nation. Liberals.

Even more to point, all of those for whom liberals create special protected classes are the immediate targets of Shariah law – homosexuals, women and minorities.

Think about it. How many times have you seen a liberal condemning radical Islam or Shariah law?

It just doesn’t happen.

So how strong is that supposed liberal commitment to women’s rights, gay rights and minority rights if they won’t stand up to the world’s biggest oppressor of women, gays and minorities?

Do liberals only fight for their constituencies in Western countries where it is safe and convenient to do so?

How come liberals never utter a peep about the grotesque, barbaric, oppressive society that is Saudi Arabia?

Despite the fact I'm not a conservative (being the apolitical guy that I now am), I must say I have to agree with this statement that you have just quoted. So, I'm waiting for the progressive response

(Cute dog! )

There will not be a hashtag for the pregnant Christian facing execution in Islamic Sudan, set to die for apostasy. The Obama Administration will not take up her cause, or in feigned outrage, protest her execution with a little shout out on social media. She will die, unless divine intervention comes from another source. Leftists progressives have used the Boko Haram outrage for the own devices, to divert attention to any perceived “social injustice” committed against Muslims in Nigeria. This is appeasement in action.

Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton haven’t championed #BringBackOurGirls because it’s a hashtag in support of the kidnapped girls, but because it undermines the Nigerian government. They aren’t trying to help the kidnapped girls. They’re trying to bring down a government that hasn’t gone along with their agenda for appeasing Boko Haram and Nigerian Muslims.

http://the-american-journal.com/no-hashtag-for-pregnant-christian-facing-execution-in-islamic-sudan/

The hashtag politics aren’t aimed at the terrorists. They’re aimed at helping the terrorists.



Obama and Boko Haram want to bring down the Nigerian government and replace it with a leadership that is more amenable to appeasement. It’s the same thing that is happening in Israel and Egypt.



Boko Haram’s kidnapping of the schoolgirls is both convenient and inconvenient for Obama and the State Department. On the one hand it has brought negative attention to their stance on Boko Haram, but on the other hand it may end up toppling the Nigerian government and empowering Muslims.

Radical or fundamentalist Islam is dangerous just as fundamental Christianity

It was a little more than 50 years ago that people were killed by Christian groups in the US for marrying outside of their race.

It was a little more than 50 years ago that people were killed by Christian groups in the US for marrying outside of their race.