@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:No, but you sure seemed to be. I never once mentioned race, yet you did. You want this and any story like it to be about race when it isn't.
Ah, yes, it's about "some people." Some people who just happen to be black. I'll keep that in mind.
McGentrix wrote:That's because it is impossible to discuss these issues without people like you making it about race. It's about personal responsibility and how the progressive movement doesn't see why anyone needs it. Redistribute wealth, generational welfare, Obama phones, the list goes on and on and this one lady is a prime example of the state of mind that people in the progressive movement sympathize with.
When you post videos of Jamie Dimon explaining why Chase shouldn't be punished for its actions during and after the financial crisis and start criticizing him and the rest of the Wall Street thieves for having "no idea of personal responsibility," I'll start believing that this isn't all about race.
McGentrix wrote:Where did you see that she has a job or works? That's what I meant when I said you read into stuff.
It was in
one of the links from your Google search, which I then linked in my post. Evidently you know how to do the search, but you don't actually look at the results. And since I can't expect you do that now, I'll post an excerpt:
Quote:After the online comments were posted, Adams became defensive in a later interview saying "Well, I tell those people, I do pay for them, I have been paying for them and that's why I'm where I'm at today." Adams claimed she and Gary Brown Sr. were working to pay for the children's care until Brown was arrested. Adams told WFLA, "I worked at numerous jobs. I worked at National Linen Company and I worked at daycares and I worked at different places so I work just like anybody else."
So no, I'm not reading that into anything. I'm
reading that. Try it some time. It can prove to be very informative.
McGentrix wrote: I've not seen any evidence of her working anywhere beyond being a walking womb. Yet you sympathize with her for whatever reason it is and feel that because she pumps out another broodling every year someone should take care of her. That she is entitled to it. Why is she entitled to anything Joe? Because she can't keep her legs closed?
I don't know what her situation is, apart from the fact that she has a large family. There's nothing wrong with that - you even acknowledge that white people can have large families, and you agree there's nothing wrong with them
even if they take government assistance. So what's the problem with Angel Adams taking government assistance if she's eligible for it?
McGentrix wrote:Google you mean? Why don't you look at the websites you frequent and find some then? I say they aren't there, prove me wrong and I can bitch about them as well.
Find them yourself. I'm not the one trying to prove he's not a bigot or a hypocrite.
McGentrix wrote:I find it discouraging that something wasn't done when she couldn't afford the first kid, much less the 16th. She obviously needs education and that was not given to her. She obviously needs guidance in life and that was not given to her, all that was given her was free **** and money. Then she is allowed to just keep on pumping out the kids. That's what I want. I want people to get an education and a job and learn what personal responsibility is. I don't think being a broodmare is much of a profession.
You object to the fact that she was
allowed to have more kids? I didn't know there was a limit. Whose job was it to make sure that she didn't have more kids?
