Is there oil in Thailand? if not its not important how many people die as a result of whatever :wink:
I think that the Thai government has got a real situation in its hand and it must proactively try and solve its problem. Armed response rarely works in these situations, it should call in international monitors and medaiters, set up talks with whoever it is that don't like what's going on and try and come up with some sort of compromise. Else it may turn nasty like it did in east timor, and also phillipines. Al Qaida is sort of like american venture capital firms, when it sees a lucrative emerging market for trouble, they make sure they are the first in the market, never been known to pass an opportunity. Also we gotta understand that aq has basically one imperative, support any one who apposes american interests or allies.... therefore the thai have to consider a couple of things first, is the trouble starting because of thai involvement in the us coalition or is it really a home grown movement of people disenfranchised by the system. The secon alternative is relatively easy to solve, the first is a nightmare. We found out a few months ago that we had home grown terrorists here in Turkey with aq ties, the wake up call was rather rude, two different wave of bombings in the middle of Istanbul with a total death toll of over 100. Now imagine what would have happened had we actively taken part in the coalition.
I'm supportive, Phoenix. I doubt any effect on the students to having armed teachers would be permanant, and in any case, probably less than if they weren't armed.
Welcome, yilmaz101. I'm not at all sure this is a matter for international monitors - the function of a monitor is to monitor, not react nor act proactively. Looking forward to your further comments. Amongst our members, your perspective is possibly unique.