5
   

Can someone please tell me if which of the two sentences is correct?

 
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 09:25 am
@JTT,

Quote:
to get yourself out of the pickle you think you are in.


No pickle.
Dave has got too much time on his hands.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 09:27 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


DAVID wrote:
I thought that writing CORRECTLY was the issue at hand.


The issue at hand is giving correct advice and help to the OP,
which I did very neatly, above.
Do u take account of your run-on sentences
in your self-congratulation ?
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 10:58 am
@McTag,
Lame lame lame. Om described you as making an egregious error and you can't explain your way out of a wet paper bag.

I wonder why you avoided this.

"What's the matter, McTag, you don't like to be on the receiving end of a pedant delivering cockamamie advice?"

Where's Contrex?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 11:09 am
@contrex,

Quote:
1. This was the fastest I heard someone responded.

2. This was the fastest I heard someone respond.

McTag wrote:
1. I heard about this, I was told by someone else.
2. I heard the actual response myself.

--------------------------------

McTag disagrees with you, Contrex.


McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 11:32 am
@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:
Do u take account of your run-on sentences


I told you, Dave, and I know you're being disingenuous but nevertheless, that these were not sentences but phrases intended to be helpful (which no-one could accuse you of being).

So, no run-on sentence. Are we clear?
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 11:35 am
@JTT,

Quote:
McTag wrote:
1. I heard about this, I was told by someone else.
2. I heard the actual response myself.

--------------------------------

McTag disagrees with you, Contrex.


Strange to relate, and unusually, these two comments were written in support of your previous post, JTT.

No need to thank me, though.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 11:41 am
@McTag,
McTag: Are we clear?

No, you haven't made yourself the least bit clear. What's new, eh?

As I mentioned,

"Lame lame lame. Om described you as making an egregious error and you can't explain your way out of a wet paper bag."

I also wondered why you avoided this.

"What's the matter, McTag, you don't like to be on the receiving end of a pedant delivering cockamamie advice?"

JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 11:45 am
@McTag,
Of course there's no need to thank you. You're not here to have your ego stroked, are you? One would hope that you are here to provide accurate info to those to ask.

Why are you avoiding addressing Contrex's position when you disagree with it?

I wonder why Contrex will avoid it all.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 04:15 pm
@JTT,

Quote:
McTag: Are we clear?

No, you haven't made yourself the least bit clear.


None so blind as he who will not see.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Feb, 2014 05:00 pm
@McTag,
I see it perfectly clear.

I'm just wondering why you can't explain your position to Om.

I'm wondering whether you like being on the receiving end of a cockamamie prescription.

I'm wondering why you don't engage Contrex when he has pointed up that you are in error.
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2014 02:56 am
@JTT,

Quote:
I'm wondering why you don't engage Contrex when he has pointed up that you are in error.


Has he? I believe that gentlemen should behave in a gentlemanly way one to another.

It is your habit to ask me impertinent questions, and it is my pleasure to suggest to you what you can do with them.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2014 10:05 am
@McTag,
I'm just wondering why you can't explain your position to Om.

I'm wondering whether you like being on the receiving end of a cockamamie prescription.

I'm wondering why you don't engage Contrex when he has pointed up that you are in error.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2014 10:35 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Quote:
1. This was the fastest I heard someone responded.

2. This was the fastest I heard someone respond.


1. I heard about this, I was told by someone else.
2. I heard the actual response myself.


Excellent!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Feb, 2014 11:20 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Quote:
Do u take account of your run-on sentences


I told you, Dave, and I know you're being disingenuous but nevertheless,
that these were not sentences but phrases intended to

be helpful (which no-one could accuse you of being).
That 's rather impolite, Mr. McTag; un-diplomatic.





David
0 Replies
 
carole1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2014 05:17 am
@checkjthomas,
Dear Thomas, I hope you're doing Good.

From my point of view both the sentence are correct.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 03:17:01