Why do people deny evolution?

@Quehoniaomath,

Nature its self gives inherent identity to an individual part of its self and that identity is the relativeness to its general environment. In man the relativeness is awakened to its self as a consciousness. The conscious observer or measurer of relative things.

1 Reply

@martinies,

Quote:

Nature its self gives inherent identity to an individual part of its self and that identity is the relativeness to its general environment. In man the relativeness is awakened to its self as a consciousness. The conscious observer or measurer of relative things.

gobbledegook mate. Again, mate.

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
Yes the bones in whale fins are the way they are because they have evolved that way from legs that once existed in a form of life that gave its genetics to a future form with an adapted purpose convenient to the environment.

Nope, sorry for that but nope.

Just "Nope"?

Why are those bones there then?

2 Replies

@McGentrix,

Just a guess - Maybe to actuate their fins with? Would they be of any use without any bones?

1 Reply

@Leadfoot,

Thing is they are mamal bones adapted from land forms. Relativity of action caused the changes in adaptation. Relativity is nonlocality. Nonlocality is god as cause of change in local stuff. And that includes magic.

1 Reply

@martinies,

I would expect mamals to have mamal bones :-)

Could have been a land form or maybe not. And if so, nonlocality could have adapted it so. With 'magic'. Hell, if relativity can make a sea creature from a cow it could even make a virgin give birth.. What's the big deal there? Even we can make a sheep from a skin cell.

Hello Dolly!

1 Reply

@McGentrix,

Quote:

Why are those bones there then?

Well, they certinly have nothing to do with walking! That is for sure.

http://www.creationliberty.com/images/basilosaurus05.jpg

lol

2 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Well bones like that do relate to walking n talking mamals. Whales communicate relativly across large distances. Unlike fish but like mamals.

1 Reply

@martinies,

Quote:

Well bones like that do relate to walking n talking mamals. Whales communicate relativly across large distances. Unlike fish but like mamals.

relate to walking????????????????????????????????????
You really must be out of your bloody mind!

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

The bone type was developed on land its goes with warm blooded mamals.

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

Quote:
Why are those bones there then?

Well, they certainly have nothing to do with walking! That is for sure.

That is true, they are not used for walking anymore. It's ancestors did, but the modern version no longer uses them for walking. How do you suppose that happened? How did the ancestor of a whale go from a land based walking critter to a swimming sea based critter? What process could have been responsible for that?

2 Replies

@McGentrix,

Quote:

That is true, they are not used for walking anymore. It's ancestors did, but the modern version no longer uses them for walking. How do you suppose that happened? How did the ancestor of a whale go from a land based walking critter to a swimming sea based critter? What process could have been responsible for that?

lol, are you people blind?
Oh no it is OVER imagination!

walking?! get real folks!

0 Replies

@McGentrix,

Relative design thats how consciousness being the pure relativity that collapses the wave function in quatum mech. Man and other life on earth was designed by the inherent relativity in nature and the cosmos as part of the creator nonlocalities design. Relativity is the contiuation of nonlocality into local design after the bigbang.

1 Reply

@martinies,

Quote:

Relative design thats how consciousness being the pure relativity that collapses the wave function in quatum mech. Man and other life on earth was designed by the inherent relativity in nature and the cosmos as part of the creator nonlocalities design. Relativity is the contiuation of nonlocality into local design after the bigbang.

problem is though, quantum theory is bollocks and there never was a biggie bangie.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

What I am saying is the relativity in the biggie bangie caused the tootsy toesies to change into finy winies. Time being a relative thing as a part of the cause of change which is relativity.

1 Reply

@martinies,

Quote:

What I am saying is the relativity in the biggie bangie caused the tootsy toesies to change into finy winies. Time being a relative thing as a part of the cause of change which is relativity.

Gooblydegook, again. You are not saying a thing.

0 Replies

@Leadfoot,

Yeah you understand leadfoot the relativity in moving action is the nonlocal mover and changer of all energy related things. The relativity in action is the god jesus spoke of and was.

0 Replies

Episodes 2, 3 and 4 are also at the link, but I kinda doubt the denialists are going to go to the trouble of learning something from even the first one:

1 Reply

@FBM,

Ok fbm I think the film shows the relative bond in h2o between hydrogen n oxygen as water caused tootsy toes to change and adapt relativly into the more harmoniously relative form of fins in water .

1 Reply

@martinies,

Relativity the relativity we experience as observers in the event is a continuation of the nonlocal situation that existed prior to the bigbang creating locality and therefor moving things. It is easy to see that relativity or difference causes and allows evolution.

1 Reply

Why do people deny evolution?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know