Why do people deny evolution?

Izzy the question at hand is why do people denny evolution. They denny it because it threatens there beliefs. Its my opinon that evolution proves that there belief s are correct. We have to put that case across to answer the origional question. Certain people harping on about dna technicalities doesnt float the boat for any argument.

We don't have to do anything. If religious idiots want to live in a fantasy world let them. It's not like any of them are going to go on to do anything important.

I want to open up a new thread. I want to talk about some of the problems with evolution that evolutionists don't like to talk about.
We all know the astronomical odds associated with the evolution of the first life. You know, like 10^^-250 conservatively speaking.
I don't want to talk about that astronomically impossible feat. I want to talk about another probability problem.

Let's just for argument sake allow for some mutation to occur in man. What would it take for that mutation to spread through the entire population?
The first obstacle is that in order for the mutation to be passed on, it must take place in the man's reproductive system. Mutations that occur in the man cannot be passed on to another generation. That would be Lamarckianism. Mutations can only be passed on to the next generation by the semen.

So that brings up the second hurdle. In order for a mutation to be passed to a second generation, the exact same mutation must occur to the woman, in her developing eggs. The mutation must be met with the same mutation in the woman in order for it to be passed on to a second generation.
The problem des not stop there. These two people both containing the mutation in their eggs/semen must live close together in both time and location, must meet, must be acceptable for mating, must be fertile, and must bring it all together with a conception.

That does not yet solve the problem, because in order for the mutation to be passed on to the second generation, there has to be a mate for the child born with the mutation. So the same problem is presented for the mate of the first generation mutant.

That mate, assuming that close intermarriage is not practiced, will have to have a father with the mutation, a mother with the mutation, are close in time and place to the first set of parents, acceptable to mate, etc, etc.

But generation 2 faces another problem. Gen 2 male and gen 2 female must again live close together in time in place, be acceptable to each other, be fertile, conceive.....

If then the mutation is passed onto gen 2 and they are able to conceive and pass the mutation on to their child, we have the same problem facing this child as the gen 0 people had. There has to be another suitable mate that also contains the mutation so that it can be passed on to gen 4.
The problem never goes away.

The fact that all mutations must occur in both the mother and the father and they must be able to pass the mutation on presents a brick wall to the mutation being passed through out the population.

In the forward direction, unless all other families are destroyed, and only the descendants of the first two mutants survive, the mutation cannot permeate the population. The mutation can only be passed along to children if it exists in both parents, at the same time and place.
The idea of mutations being passed down and appearing in the general population cannot happen. The whole idea of how God designed the earth to work was to make mankind self-repairing. That is one of the reasons for sexual reproduction as opposed to asexual reproduction. The gene pool works to clean itself. Mutations are SELECTED OUT, SO AS TO PREVENT DAMAGE THE GENE POOL.

One more problem that is not discussed is that the mutation must occur in either the semen producing cells or the egg producing cells. If it occurs in the grown man or woman, and not in the reproductive cells, the mutation is a mechanical change to the man or woman and can not be passed on to the offspring.

The odds of the same mutation occurring in a sperm cell and an egg, co-located in the same place and time, in two people who like each other is beyond vanishingly small. One cycle off in the woman and mutation is gone. The sperm carrying the mutation impregnating the only egg containing the mutation is a one in a billion event. But throw in a bad case of self abuse in the man, and the one sperm carrying the mutation is shot off into a sock.

Evolution is trying to climb a straight up cliff covered with engine grease.