1
   

Business bigwigs making a buck at your expense, still.

 
 
Post: # 634,539
View Profile littlek
 
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 12:36 pm
I was listening to Marketplace last night on my way home from work. David Brown (swoon!) had a piece on "a new study from the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University." Businesses have been gaining over the last 2 years, but employees are getting fewer and fewer benefits from that gain, in an unprecedented move towards rewarding the upper eschelon of business culture. Have you guys heard about this? What do you, who are much more business savvy than I, have to say about the issue?

NYTimes

Marketplace
 
Post: # 634,578
View Profile husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 12:51 pm
Greed - plain and simple
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,056
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 05:21 pm
Well, yeah.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,221
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 06:45 pm
Anymore input on the topic?
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,227
View Profile Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 06:48 pm
I think husker summed it up perfectly.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,276
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:13 pm
so, we employees just bend over?
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,282
View Profile Jer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:21 pm
In the long run we could try to buy from companies who run profit sharing deals with employees, who emphasize team as opposed to greed.

Supporting small business whenever possible over corporations is a good way to vote with your dollars too.

It's hard to read an article like the one you just posted - what do the ultra-rich do with all that money??
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,283
View Profile PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:22 pm
Instant gratification: Vote out the Republicans; they only care about CEOs.

(The GOP has perpetrated the biggest fraud on the working man in my lifetime by convincing them their policies were better for them than the Democrats'. People really need to wake up and hose these guys out of every office they hold across the country. Every last one. Of course it'll never happen, but an awakening would go a long way to restoring some balance.)

Delayed gratification: Organize a union.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,299
View Profile Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:31 pm
Jer wrote:


It's hard to read an article like the one you just posted - what do the ultra-rich do with all that money??


That's what I'd like to know. They're earning more than any sane person could ever spend in a lifetime.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,333
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:52 pm
It's like they are booboo lipped about the crack down on CEO pay rates and retirement packages.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,335
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:53 pm
Jer - good points, but we still have to work for the money suckers.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,336
View Profile Jer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:54 pm
That's why I work for myself Wink
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,340
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:56 pm
and why I am a nanny. Even though the mom and pop I work for are working for good companies that are decent to their employees, they still haven't gotten decent raises in the last 2 years.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,344
View Profile Jer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 07:58 pm
littlek,

How long have you been nannying for? That must be cool to watch kids grow-up.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,347
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 08:01 pm
4.5 years. I worked with 2 different families for part of that. It is cool.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,349
View Profile fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 08:01 pm
I'd like to see the actual study. The article reads dread and doom but is that what's really happening?

There was some talk last year about some sort of problem with the mandated pension funding formulas that the government has had in place that was causing companies to dump tons of money into pension programs (it was out of balance with the number of employees that would ever collect under the pensions..).

The article mentions "The bulk of the gains did not go to workers, "but instead were used to boost profits, lower prices, or increase C.E.O. compensation."

So how much of this shift was due to each of those factors? If profits were boosted what was done with them? Was that money reinvested in the company? Paid out to shareholders? It had to have gone somewhere.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,360
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 08:09 pm
fishen - here's the report, all 15 pages of it...
http://www.nupr.neu.edu/4-04/corporate_profits.pdf
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,364
View Profile fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 08:11 pm
Kewl. Wink I'll go read.
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,369
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 08:14 pm
you're nuts!
0 Replies
 
Post: # 635,378
View Profile husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Apr, 2004 08:19 pm
If I read this - I prolly find some reason not to get a raise this year
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

A balance-of-payments surplus - Discussion by bap0422
Dividend Increase - Discussion by Miller
Judge's Ruling Means Altria May Split - Discussion by Miller
WILL ECONOMIC POPULISM MAKE A COMEBACK? - Discussion by Advocate
Impact of housing slowdown - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Depository Recipts? - Discussion by Miller
China will own 1 trillion US dollars - Discussion by detano inipo
 
  1. able2know
  2. » Business bigwigs making a buck at your expense, still.
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.33 seconds on 11/28/2009 at 08:29:00 Top End