5
   

Is the word "causes" used perperly here?

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2012 10:26 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Arguably, the mutation created a new virus,
which was more drug-resistant.


Have you read the study?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2012 10:29 am
@ehBeth,
No.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Aug, 2012 07:42 pm
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

oristarA wrote:
Bless my soul: "The mutation makes the virus resistant to the drug:" is right and "The mutation causes the virus resistant to the drug" is wrong. The English language is indeed nit-picking.


Nit-picking is pointless and excessively pedantic attention to small errors that do not matter. Correcting such errors as the above is not nit-picking. If you just want to write and speak pidgin English just go ahead - don't listen to us and don't ask questions here. If you said 2+2=5 and I corrected you, would you say that was nit-picking?



There is no place for pidgin English in A2K College. Very Happy

To be frank, I meant that further grammatical analysis for the use of "cause" is probably required.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Drs. = female doctor? - Question by oristarA
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
The definition of the "index" here - Question by oristarA
PAY ATTENTION? - Discussion by William
reduce the number of items damaged - Question by tintin-and-calculus
The prospect of funding pensions - Question by tintin
most poorly represented period - Question by tintin
meaning of second paragraph - Question by tanguatlay
what's the meaning of the sentence? - Question by grace-g
Translate English into Latin - Discussion by merthorn
 
Copyright © 2013 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 8.72 seconds on 05/19/2013 at 12:02:04