The fact that it arises from a described "Conservative talk show host"
seems to negate your feeble argument Dave,
I question his AUTHENTICITY
Whipping the citizens was not part of the Founding philosophy.
( Incidentally, I have no clue qua the reason that he wants to WHIP anyone. )
youve got to buy the fcat that your movement seems to be peopled by extremists not rationalists.
. Look, when u go to the bank
and u make a deposit, u expect the clerks not only to be
, but beyond that, u expect absolute perfection
of accuracy; right??
If u deposit $1,000 its not OK for them to give u credit for $900
nor for $975, along with the justification: "that's close enuf."
The criterion is PERFECTION
; deviation therefrom is liberal
U expect the bank clerk to be rational on-the-job, with no
deviation from rationality.
That is a conservative, orthodox application of the protocol of banking. Yes??
I deem conservatism to be application of the views of the Founders,
without distortion, with no deviation. I consider that to be rational
; extremely rational.
I also love Barry Goldwater's
"extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice
and . . . moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!"
Your post makes me wonder if u 'd complain
that your surgeon's hands r TOO extreme
ly clean on-the-job.
You make many statements how you libertarians are "creatures of the mind",
Did I use that language?
I LIKE IT!
Its very deep, farmer; very deep.
I suspect that the universe is made out of consciousness.
then you try to dust this off as "Not of your ilk".
Yes; he sounds like an imposter.
Sorry, he dosnt get a pass by some meager attempt at label tossing.
Many of your species, like LArs LArsen or Savage, and obviously this guy, are just raving nuts.
I don't know them, so I can't comment about them.