I've already seen it. It contains no information relevant to a scientific understanding of anything.
You seen it with eyes closed then,
Did you consider this?
This is the simple explanation taught by mainstream science concerning "particles" of energy.
Atoms are particles of elements, substances that can not be broken down further. In examining atomic structure though, we have to clarify this statement. An atom cannot be broken down further without changing the chemical nature of the substance. For example, if you have 1 ton, 1 gram or 1 atom of oxygen, all of these units have the same properties. We can break down the atom of oxygen into smaller particles; however, when we do the atom looses its chemical properties. For example, if you have 100 watches, or one watch, they all behave like watches and tell time. You can dismantle one of the watches: take the back off, take the batteries out, peer inside and pull things out. However, now the watch no longer behaves like a watch. So what does an atom look like inside?
Atoms are made up of 3 types of particles electrons, protons and neutrons. These particles have different properties. Electrons are tiny, very light particles that have a negative electrical charge (-). Protons are much larger and heavier than electrons and have the opposite charge, protons have a positive charge. Neutrons are large and heavy like protons; however neutrons have no electrical charge. Each atom is made up of a combination of these particles.
(Heavier- contains more energy)
These three energies
are actually equal in energy
. The negative
energy appears week
because it became stretched
into the dark energy
of the fabric of the darkness
, by the expansion of the universe as it came into being. Where this energy is in contact with the neutral energy of an atom, it surrounds the atom and creates the energy cloud.
The pressure from the dark energy
compresses the neutral energy
around the nucleus, which in turn compresses the positive energy contained therein.
There is interaction between the positive and negative energies through the neutral energy, which both connects
the positive and negative energies
An atom made up of one proton and one electron, is called hydrogen (the abbreviation for hydrogen is H). The proton and electron stay together because just like two magnets, the opposite electrical charges attract each other.
This statement is false; this has nothing to do with electromagnetism, at this level. The force of the negative energy that make up the fabric of dark energy that fills the universe, pushing against a wall of neutral energy, creates the negative energy cloud surrounding the nucleus.
All of the pressure of this dark energy compresses the positive energy, like water pressure in an ocean of darkness, separated by a wall of neutral energy,
What keeps the two from crashing into each other? The particles in an atom are not still. The electron is constantly spinning around the center of the atom (called the nucleus). The centrifugal force of the spinning electron keeps the two particles from coming into contact with each other much as the earth's rotation keeps it from plunging into the sun.
Wrong, centrifugal force has nothing to do with it. The wall of neutral energy that connects the negative to the positive also separates the two. It’s the sudden appearance of the neutral energy that created and separated the negative from the positive in the very first moment of creation.
There is absolutely no comparison between the affect of gravity, and centrifugal force on the earth’s rotation around the sun, and the structure of an atom.
Keep in mind that atoms are extremely small. One hydrogen atom, for example, is approximately 5 x 10-8 mm in diameter. To put that in perspective, this dash - is approximately 1 mm in length, therefore it would take almost 20 million hydrogen atoms to make a line as long as the dash. In the sub-atomic world, things often behave a bit strangely. First of all, the electron actually spins very far from the nucleus. If we were to picture a hydrogen atom, so that the proton was ½ inch in diameter, the electron would actually be spinning approximately 0.5 km (or about a quarter of a mile) away from the nucleus. In other words, if the proton was ½ inch in diameter, the whole atom would be about the size of Giants Stadium.
You could change the size scale infinitely
, what does that say about what fills the giant stadium
? The negative
energies interact through this mass of neutral
What is unique about our planet?, Our atmosphere, that separates the waters above from the waters beneath. And God called the firmament heaven
. We share a consciousness of reality.
Our blood carries oxygen to our brains, starve the brain of oxygen and our consciousness leaves our bodies
in near death experience. Our brain dies we leave our bodies
and experience the dream
that is heaven, or hell.
Our brains light up our minds to experience the dream of the physical through our six senses. Our subconscious minds share a subconscious mind within the atmosphere of reality? Within the arena of the neutral energy of the oxygen atoms?, a thought to ponder.
Ephesians 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince
of the power
of the air,
that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
1 Thessalonians 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air
: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
Revelation 16:17 And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air;
and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done.
Another peculiarity of this tiny world is the particles themselves. Protons and neutrons behave like small particles, sort of like tiny billiard balls.
The electron however, has some of the properties of a wave. In other words, the electron is more similar to a beam of light than it is to a billiard ball. Thus, to represent it as a small particle spinning around a nucleus is slightly misleading.In actuality, the electron is a wave that surrounds the nucleus of an atom like a cloud.
(Totally misleading) What is viewed as an electron is the highest point of concentration of negative energy spinning around the nucleus, trying to be in the same place at the same time as the nucleus, which is not possible.
In an electrically neutral atom, the positively charged protons are always balanced by an equal number of negatively charged electrons. As we have seen, hydrogen is the simplest atom with only one proton and one electron. Helium is the 2nd simplest atom. It has two protons in its nucleus and two electrons spinning around the nucleus. With helium though, we have to introduce another particle. Because the 2 protons in the nucleus have the same charge on them, they would tend to repel each other, and the nucleus would fall apart.
True, they do repel each other, as they try to be in the same place, at the same time, which, as I previously stated, is impossible.
To keep the nucleus from pushing apart, helium has two neutrons in its nucleus. Neutrons have no electrical charge on them and act as a sort of nuclear glue, holding the protons, and thus the nucleus, together.
Wrong, neutrons do not act like glue. As positive energy
is added to the nucleus, neutral energy
is also added, which in turn attracts more negative energy
to the electron cloud
. These three energies are always balanced.
Because you can’t add more energy in the “stadium” of space
between the nucleus
and the electron cloud
, the extra neutral energy added, appears in the nucleus with the proton energy. Each point of energy within the nucleus is equal to the amount of neutral energy in the neutral “Giant Stadium” or wall that separates the nucleus from the outer electron cloud, which is also equal to the negative energy drawn to the electron cloud. The negative energy,
which is stretched
across the cosmos of space
, pushing against the outer wall
energy, compresses the nucleus
You may see no information relevant to a scientific understanding of anything,
but I"m issuing a challenge to the Minds of Science to a debate,
all the way to 12/21/2012