The rioters were making the Englishmen (both genders, adults n children) strip naked in the streets,
to embarras them and/or to get the clothes to sell them or maybe to wear them.
No they weren't.
Yes, thay WERE
The only person who has been going on about stripping people naked is you.
I have been following this story as you know
and the only source of stripping people naked is you.
Following the story very closely, were u????
how well u attend to ALL
of your work????
I have already posted a picture of the humiliation in question.
As I told u previously, I am trying (without much success)
to bring out the point that this misconduct is an affront to English dignity
This shoud evoke an extremely brutal vengeance,
to vindicate your honor, but NOTHING is forthcoming
U shoud all be very ashamed for tolerating that. (Its very un
Churchill-like [tho Chamberlain
I imagine that socialism
has engendered a spirit of docility
and toleration of ANY indignity
, no matter how foul.
I was perplexed that u have not even ATTEMPTED to deny
that the English have sunk so low in spirit.
Now u deny that the offense happened at all
(U put me in mind of an incident from my childhood:
my nabor, a Mexican boy, committed some outrageous acts
of endangering me and intentionally burning my dog, King,
for the pain of it. King cried out in alarm & pain. He laffed.
Eventually, I caught him; [we were the same age and size].
I was about to beat the hell out of him.
The first time that I hit him, he twisted such that I hardly touched
him at all, just a few ounces of pressure, but he began to cry
as if something horrible had happened, with such INTENSITY
that I did not have the heart to continue.
I let him get away with it.
A few weeks thereafter, he denied
that he had wept at all
during the incident.
Following in his footsteps, u now deny
the injury to English dignity.)
I 'm not much of a researcher, but I 'll try to find
the accounts of this humiliation of the English
that thay so mildly accept.
here r some pertinent links that I got from Google
on the disputed subject (since u tacitly imply that I am lying):
(Please note the photograph
, as supporting evidence; several of the news stories have used it.)
There have been multiple stories in the news on the subject,
including this one:
"London riots: Thugs force people to strip naked to steal clothes
Thugs taking part in the London riots even forced people to strip naked
to steal the clothes off their back."
Rumours on Twitter and other social media sites
last night suggested that people were being forced
to give up their clothes, and now shocking pictures
have emerged of a young man giving his jeans,
shoes and t-shirt to a looter.
It has also been suggested that people were being stripped naked
in Birmingham, where spates of violence also erupted last night,
although these reports are unsubstantiated.
The images were among a number of shocking pictures which
emerged following last night's riots, with another showing
a woman completely naked next to a police officer
having seemingly had her clothes stolen.
A disturbing video also shows an injured teenager being robbed
by a gang who pretended to help him up.
A number of areas in London were affected by the third consecutive night
of riots yesterday, with Clapham Junction, Croydon, Camden and
Brixton among the locations targeted.
In an attempt to keep the peace this evening, an unprecedented
16,000 police officers will take to the streets of London. Last night
there were just 6,000 on duty.
Prime minister David Cameron today spoke out against the
'sickening scenes of people looting, vandalising, thieving [and]
robbing' and warned that those taking part will face the 'full force of the law'."
[All emfasis has been added by David.]
Is that enuf
or do u require more????
How about U, JTT
Is that enuf, or do u require MORE