6
   

The Lion's Edge

 
 
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 10:55 am
Thought for the day and something I've never seen in print...

Ordinarily, in lion/zebra encounters, the lion has killed other zebras before, but the zebra has never been killed or eaten before.....

Is that some sort of an unfair advantage?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 6 • Views: 863 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:38 am
Unless the zebra knows a little kung fu.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HlL2R4cQao

Joe('Tis a cruel world)Nation
0 Replies
 
coluber2001
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 11:56 am
@gungasnake,
It would seem that individually, at least, the lion has the edge--a lone zebra is a dead zebra. But collectively zebras have selected for their defenses over time: the herd behavior--the safety of the herd with those vicious hooves, and striped coloration to confuse the predator.

Another thing to remember is that hunting is treacherous for the hunter too. If a zebra gets wounded, it may survive, and finding food is no problem. If a lion gets wounded--say, by a flying hoof--it may be unable to run fast enough to make a kill and slowly starve to death.
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:43 pm
@gungasnake,
With the zebra wearing that linesman/officials uniform, it's been well-schooled at making judgement calls. Sometimes they have to confer at the booth. Of course, by that time they're zebra burgers.

Seriously, it's flawed logic because even though one zebra has not been killed before, they still know real danger (and what to do) when they see it coming. I see no advantage for the lion. Hiding and scattering in the confusing array of darting stripes minimizes the advantage if there is one.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 12:50 pm
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:
Is that some sort of an unfair advantage?

There are a lot more zebras than lions. The advantage depends on your perspective and your strategy.
0 Replies
 
wayne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 01:37 pm
@gungasnake,
Being killed and eaten is the result, not the means.
Here you have determined the result, then attempted to equate that as an advantage within the means, faulty reasoning.
Most zebras have been stalked before and know that the safety of the herd is thier advantage. The lion seeks his advantage in stalking the weaker members of the herd, the young, old, and sickly.
The zebra only gets one chance, the lion gets a few. However, when you spread the zebra's risk over the herd, the lion has about the same odds as the zebra.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Mar, 2011 06:58 pm
There are more zebras in the world today than lions. So any advantage can't be that unfair Wink
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Mar, 2011 07:34 am
Avoiding predators is a learned art.
Learned by young zebra from previous attempts on the herd.
Predators target the weak herd members who are unable to maintain the learned behavior. The strong and fit members survive.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Odd Moments in the Animal Kingdom - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Beautiful Animals - Discussion by Roberta
Windmills Killing Eagles - Discussion by gungasnake
Nature - Do you crave more? - Discussion by Foofie
BATS DYING FROM WHITE MOLD SYNDROME - Discussion by farmerman
Plant Identification Forums - Question by Pitter
Cycling Upside Down - Under Ice! - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Lion's Edge
Copyright © 2014 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/28/2014 at 12:03:38