57
   

WikiLeaks about to hit the fan

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Jun, 2012 03:36 pm
@msolga,
Quote:
Urge Correa to Grant Asylum to Assange
Submitted by Megan Iorio on 22 June 2012 - 5:14pm

The following letter has been circulated mostly in the United States by Just Foreign Policy. It was hand-delivered to the Embassy of Ecuador in London by Just Foreign Policy Policy Director Robert Naiman on Monday, June 25. Read the press release.

We also hand-deliver the online petition circulated by Just Foreign Policy, which has now been signed by more than 4000 people. That petition - which you can still sign - is here: http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/assange-asylum :


Quote:
June 25, 2012

Dear President Correa,

We are writing to urge you to grant political asylum to Julian Assange.

As you know, British courts recently struck down Mr. Assange’s appeal against extradition to Sweden, where he is not wanted on criminal charges, but merely for questioning. Mr. Assange has repeatedly made clear he is willing to answer questions relating to accusations against him, but in the United Kingdom. But the Swedish government insists that he be brought to Sweden for questioning. This by itself, as Swedish legal expert and former Chief District Prosecutor for Stockholm Sven-Erik Alhem testified, is “unreasonable and unprofessional, as well as unfair and disproportionate.”

We believe Mr. Assange has good reason to fear extradition to Sweden, as there is a strong likelihood that once in Sweden, he would be imprisoned, and then likely extradited to the United States.

As U.S. legal expert and commentator Glenn Greenwald recently noted, were Assange to be charged in Sweden, he would be imprisoned under “very oppressive conditions, where he could be held incommunicado,” rather than released on bail. Pre-trial hearings for such a case in Sweden are held in secret, and so the media and wider public, Greenwald notes, would not know how the judicial decisions against Mr. Assange would be made and what information would be considered.

The Washington Post has reported that the U.S. Justice Department and Pentagon conducted a criminal investigation into "whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange violated criminal laws in the group's release of government documents, including possible charges under the Espionage Act." Many fear, based on documents released by Wikileaks, that the U.S. government has already prepared an indictment and is waiting for the opportunity to extradite Assange from Sweden.

The U.S. Justice Department has compelled other members of Wikileaks to testify before a grand jury in order to determine what charges might be brought against Mr. Assange. The U.S. government has made clear its open hostility to Wikileaks, with high-level officials even referring to Mr. Assange as a “high-tech terrorist,” and seeking access to the Twitter account of Icelandic legislator Birgitta Jónsdóttir due to her past ties to Wikileaks.

Were he charged, and found guilty under the Espionage Act, Assange could face the death penalty.

Prior to that, the case of Pfc. Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier accused of providing U.S. government documents to Wikileaks, provides an illustration of the treatment that Assange might expect while in custody. Manning has been subjected to repeated and prolonged solitary confinement, harassment by guards, and humiliating treatment such as being forced to strip naked and stand at attention outside his cell. These are additional reasons that your government should grant Mr. Assange political asylum.

We also call on you to grant Mr. Assange political asylum because the “crime” that he has committed is that of practicing journalism. He has revealed important crimes against humanity committed by the U.S. government, most notably in releasing video footage from an Apache helicopter of a 2007 incident in which the U.S. military appears to have deliberately killed civilians, including two Reuters employees. Wikileaks’ release of thousands of U.S. State Department cables revealed important cases of U.S. officials acting to undermine democracy and human rights around the world.

Because this is a clear case of an attack on press freedom and on the public's right to know important truths about U.S. foreign policy, and because the threat to his health and well-being is serious, we urge you to grant Mr. Assange political asylum.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.


Michael Moore, Film Director
Danny Glover, Film Director
Oliver Stone, Film Director
Bill Maher, Comedian, Television Host, Political Commentator, Author
Naomi Wolf, Author
Daniel Ellsberg, Vietnam War Whistleblower
Glenn Greenwald, Constitutional lawyer and columnist, Salon.com
Noam Chomsky
Patch Adams, MD
Chris Hedges, Journalist
Jemima Khan, British Writer and Campaigner
Coleen Rowley, retired FBI agent & former Minneapolis Division Legal Counsel, one of three “whistleblowers” named Time Magazine’s “Persons of the Year” in 2002
Ann Wright, US Army Colonel (Retired) and former US diplomat
Ray McGovern, Former U.S. Army officer and longtime senior CIA analyst (ret.)
Thomas Drake, NSA Whistleblower, Bill of Rights Activist
Linda Lewis, Board Member, Whistleblower Support Fund
Kent Spriggs, Guantanamo habeas counsel
Jesselyn Radack, National Security & Human Rights Director, Government Accountability Project
Jacob Appelbaum, Developer, The Tor Project
Mark Weisbrot, Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research
Medea Benjamin, Cofounder, Global Exchange
Kathy Kelly, Co-coordinator, Voices for Creative Nonviolence
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
Mark Johnson, Executive Director, Fellowship of Reconciliation
Denis J. Halliday, UN Assistant Secretary-General 1994-98. National of Ireland
Leslie Cagan, co-founder, United for Peace and Justice
Bill Fletcher, Jr., Co-author, "Solidarity Divided: The Crisis in Organized Labor and A New Path Toward Social Justice"
Kevin Gosztola, writer for Firedoglake, co-author, Truth & Consequences: The US vs. Bradley Manning
Russ Wellen, Foreign Policy in Focus
James Early, Board Member, Institute for Policy Studies
Jim Naureckas, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Sam Husseini, Director, Washington Office of the Institute for Public Accuracy
Robert Naiman, Policy Director, Just Foreign Policy

Jane Hirschmann, Jews Say No! New York, organizer, U.S. Boat to Gaza
Richard Levy, lawyer, passenger, U.S. Boat to Gaza
Helaine Meisler, Orton-Gillingham Learning Specialist, Helaine Meisler Learning Center, Woodstock, New York
Laurie Arbeiter, Artist/Activist, WE WILL NOT BE SILENT
Johnny Barber, Photographer/Activist
Gail Miller, Social Worker/Activist, Women of a Certain Age
Carol Murry, Doctor of Public Health, Hawaii
Libor Von Schönau, OccupyWallStreet Legal, New York
Charlotte Wiktorsson, Doctor, Sweden
David K. Schermerhorn, Deer Harbor, WA, passenger, U.S. Boat to Gaza
Hedy Epstein, St. Louis, passenger, U.S. Boat to Gaza
Paki Wieland, MA, passenger, U.S. Boat to Gaza
Felice Gelman, Jews Say No!, New York
Linda Durham, Founder, The Wonder Institute
Winston Weeks, Policy Analyst, Citizens Education Project, Salt Lake City, UT
Ellen Barfield, Veterans For Peace
Gar W. Lipow, journalist, member of Olympia Movement for Justice and Peace, author of Solving the Climate Crisis through Social Change
Stephen Sander, Lawyer, Sydney, Australia

Mayo C. Toruño, Professor and Chair, Economics Department, California State University, San Bernardino
Julio Huato, Associate Professor of Economics, St. Francis College
Michael Brun, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Illinois State University
James G. Devine, Professor of Economics, Loyola Marymount University

Michael A Lebowitz, Professor Emeritus, Economics (Canada)
Marta Harnecker, writer (Chile)
Dana Frank, Professor, Department of History, University of California, Santa Cruz
Adrienne Pine, Assistant Professor of Anthropology, American University
Miguel Tinker Salas, Professor, Latin American History, Pomona College
Steve Ellner, Professor of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University/Universidad de Oriente, Venezuela
Marc Becker, Professor of Latin American History, Truman State University
Dr Francisco Dominguez, Head of Centre for Brazilian and Latin American Studies, Middlesex University, London, UK
Peter Hallward, Professor of Philosophy, Kingston University London
Doug Hertzler, Associate Professor of Anthropology, Eastern Mennonite University
Arturo Escobar, Dept. of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Carolyn Eisenberg, Professor of US Foreign Policy, Hofstra University
Vijay Prashad, Professor of International Studies, Trinity College, USA
T.M. Scruggs, Professor Emeritus, University of Iowa
Ellen Schrecker, Professor of History, Yeshiva University
Antonia Darder, Leavey Endowed Chair of Ethics and Moral Leadership, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles
Demetra Evangelou, Professor, Purdue University
Gilbert G. Gonzalez, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Irvine
Renate Bridenthal, Professor (retired), City University of New York
A. Belden Fields, Professor Emeritus, Political Science, University of Illinois
C. G. Estabrook, Visiting Professor (retired), University of Illinois


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-06-26/high-profile-americans-back-assanges-asylum-bid/4092192


0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Jun, 2012 09:27 am
Quote:
Assange’s extradition moves close to reality
(June 29, 2012 By JILL LAWLESS, The Associated Press)

LONDON — British police served Julian Assange on Thursday with a demand that he report to a police station as the first step in his extradition to Sweden to face sex crime allegations.

The WikiLeaks founder said he was unlikely to obey the order to show up today.

The letter was delivered to Ecuador’s London embassy, where Assange has been holed up for nine days.

The Metropolitan Police said it had “served a surrender notice upon a 40-year-old man that requires him to attend a police station at a date and time of our choosing. This is standard practice in extradition cases and is the first step in the removal process.”

The force did not identify Assange by name but offered the statement when asked about him.

Assange told the BBC he did not plan to comply.

“Our advice is that asylum law both internationally and domestically takes precedence over extradition law, so almost certainly not,” he said.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 09:09 am
Quote:
Carr opines that Julian Assange is of little interest to the US by this time
(Philip Dorling, The Sydney Morning Herald, July 3, 2012)

FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr is confident the US will not seek to extradite Julian Assange, but his department has delayed and blocked the release of documents that would show what the government knows about the US espionage investigation into the WikiLeaks publisher.

Senator Carr yesterday argued that the US failure to make an extradition request to Britain over the past two years showed the Obama government had given up its pursuit of Mr Assange for releasing hundreds of thousands of classified US military and diplomatic reports.

''I'm not surprised that the Justice Department is not declaring the case closed,'' Senator Carr said yesterday. ''But if this were a priority for the [Obama] administration you would have seen legal action when very easily, very readily they would have been in a position to have taken it.''

Senator Carr was being questioned about renewed calls by the chairwoman of the US Senate intelligence oversight committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein, for Mr Assange to be prosecuted for espionage.

''All the indications I've picked up from the public statements of US officials including the American ambassador in Australia is that they are a long way from having made a decision about this'', Senator Carr said. ''I'd be surprised if they were to pursue it … I am simply not persuaded that this is something actively engaging the Americans.''

Mr Assange sought political asylum at the Ecuadorean embassy in London on June 19 and has defied a British police order to turn himself in for extradition to Sweden where he is sought for questioning in relation to sexual assault allegations.

Mr Assange fears a hostile political climate in Sweden will facilitate his ultimate extradition to the US.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 11:23 am
@wandeljw,
Quote:
Carr opines that Julian Assange is of little interest to the US by this time


I expressed the same idea months ago on this thread. You didn't notice it at the time wande and that suggests you are in awe of authority figures.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 04:06 pm
@wandeljw,
Quote:
FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr is confident the US will not seek to extradite Julian Assange, but his department has delayed and blocked the release of documents that would show what the government knows about the US espionage investigation into the WikiLeaks publisher.

Which is a bit like having a bob each way, isn't it?

Quote:
Senator Carr was being questioned about renewed calls by the chairwoman of the US Senate intelligence oversight committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein, for Mr Assange to be prosecuted for espionage.

''All the indications I've picked up from the public statements of US officials including the American ambassador in Australia is that they are a long way from having made a decision about this'', Senator Carr said. ''I'd be surprised if they were to pursue it … I am simply not persuaded that this is something actively engaging the Americans.''

Neutral
I will be more convinced when the US ambassador's comments to the Australian audience are identical to Diane Feinstein's .... & Hilary Clinton's, & others of importance in the US administration.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 Jul, 2012 05:01 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Quote:
Carr opines that Julian Assange is of little interest to the US by this time

I expressed the same idea months ago on this thread. You didn't notice it at the time wande and that suggests you are in awe of authority figures.

You did?
I must have missed it, too. Maybe I'm in awe of authority figures, too? Smile
On what basis did you form that view? Refresh our memories.

Our previous foreign minister, Kevin Rudd, was not exactly helpful in assisting Julian Assange (as the Australian government has repeatedly claimed) in fact seemed deliberately hazy on the details of why he required urgent support.:

Quote:
....the government has been far less diligent in raising the Assange case with the US, where a grand jury in Alexandra, Virginia has been gathering evidence to charge Assange and others under the Espionage Act, which potentially carries the death penalty. Rudd’s response merely indicates the government is “closely monitoring all developments” but was not aware of any extradition request or charges against Assange in the US.

In relation to the specific issue of the grand jury investigation, however, Rudd’s answer was somewhat more cryptic. “The Australian government has no formal advice of any grand jury investigation,” is all he would state, leaving open the possibility the issue had been raised informally or at officials’ level.

Rudd also handpassed several matters to Attorney-General Robert McClelland, (correctly) saying the issue of whether ASIO could now spy on Assange under the “WikiLeaks amendment” passed earlier this year to expand its powers, and issues to do with the possibility of Assange being extradited from Australia, were matters for McClelland.

Assange and Rudd: the government’s strange lack of curiosity:
http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/24/julian-assange-kevin-rudd-extradition/

As you appear to have accepted our current foreign minister's (Bob Carr) say-so, so readily, that the US is no longer interested in Assange, perhaps you are the one who is in awe of what "authority figures" say? Wink

Here's what Crikey's Bernard Keane thinks Bob Carr should be asking the US administration .... if he doing his job properly. :

Quote:
The question for Bob Carr is not whether he has asked the Americans about a sealed indictment (which is not publicly confirmed, but the subject of extensive and corroborated reports, including from WikiLeaks’s opponents) but whether he has demanded to know why an Australian journalist (and found to be a journalist by sources as varied as the UK Supreme Court, the Walkley Foundation in Australia and the Martha Gellhorn trust in the UK) is the target of a US investigation simply for that journalism.

If the Minister doesn’t want to ask about that, there are plenty of other questions he could ask his American counterparts based on what is on the public record:

- why is the Obama Administration stopping and interrogating activists who have been in contact with Assange when they attempt to travel internationally?

- why is the Obama Administration orchestrating a financial blockade by major international financial intermediaries of WikiLeaks?

- why did the Vice-President describe Assange as a terrorist?

- why did the State Department, with no evidence, insist Assange is not entitled to protections under the First Amendment?

Rather than ask questions about matters that are on the public record, Carr prefers to hew to the narrow government line that this is all about consular support for Assange re Sweden and the Americans have no interest in him.

It’s gutless and feeble stuff from a government that has repeatedly shown itself eager to do anything to keep the US happy.

Bob Carr, in full flight from the facts on Assange:
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2012/06/24/bob-carr-in-full-flight-from-the-facts-on-assange/

.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 01:06 am

Quote:

Syria files: Wikileaks releases 2m 'embarrassing' emails
5 July 2012 Last updated at 12:11 GMT/BBC News

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/61381000/jpg/_61381639_015251590-1.jpg
Members of Syria's rebel Free Syrian Army (file) Wikileaks says only by understanding the conflict in Syria can it be resolved

The whistle-blowing website Wikileaks says it is releasing more than two million emails from Syrian political figures, ministries and corporations.

"Ground-breaking" news stories derived from the "Syria files" will be published over the next two months, Wikileaks said.

Its founder Julian Assange was quoted as saying the material was embarrassing - not only to Syria but its opponents.


The emails are said to date from August 2006 to March 2012.

Syrian authorities have been fighting an internal rebellion for some 16 months. Some 15,800 people have died, activists say.

'Intimate correspondence'

Emails from the Syrian ministries of presidential affairs, foreign affairs, finance, information, transport and culture are all represented among the data to be released, Sarah Harrison from Wikileaks told reporters in London.

"The range of information extends from the intimate correspondence of the most senior [governing] Baath party figures to records of financial transfers sent from Syrian ministries to other nations," she said
.

Mr Assange remains in the Ecuadorean embassy in London, where he is trying to avoid extradition to Sweden over accusations of rape and sexual assault.

But Ms Harrison quoted him as saying that this material "helps us not merely to criticise one group or another, but to understand their interests, actions and thoughts. It is only through understanding this conflict that we can hope to resolve it."

Some of the 2,434,899 emails would reveal, Wikileaks promises, "how the West and Western companies say one thing and do another".

News stories based on the emails will be published by news providers including US news agency Associated Press, Spain's Publico.es and Egypt's al-Masry al-Youm.

Some stories which have already appeared seem to concern communications between Syrian representatives and Western suppliers of equipment that could be used for military purposes.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18724328
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 12:10 pm
@msolga,
Quote:
Some of the 2,434,899 emails would reveal, Wikileaks promises, "how the West and Western companies say one thing and do another".


Well, duuuuuuuuuhhhhhh!

I wonder why the really, really honest people, the people who are so interested in the truth, you know, Farmerman, Setanta, Thack45, Foofie, Cycloptichorn, Ticomaya, CI, Rabel, Okie, Gob1, ... aren't here at this thread addressing these inconvenient truths.

[ Smile okay, I know why Okie isn't here]
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 08:28 pm
@JTT,
Yikes, calm down, JTT!
We don't even know for certain what will be revealed through those Syria emails yet!

JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:01 pm
@msolga,
It's the USA we're talking about here. This is a country whose elected representatives didn't even know that Hitler, umm, I mean Nixon was bombing the crap out of Cambodia and Laos.

This is a country that glorified Reagan, as he was having Nicaraguans tortured and murdered and the US media whitewashed it all.

This is a country that was bombing the **** out of the people in the southern part of Vietnam, (under how many successive US governments) that had massive torture squads all to try to force them to stop supporting the government they wanted.

That is certainly not an exhaustive list.

This is the USA we`re talking about.

Wanna make a bet, MsO?
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:04 pm
@JTT,
I suspect that there'd be quite a bit concerning Russian arms sales to Syria. No surprises there.
As for the rest, we will have to wait & see.
I really don't know for sure, I'd just be guessing at this point. But it wouldn't surprise me if other countries were supplying arms to Syria, while bleating about oppression of Syrian citizens & the lack of democratic processes there at the same time.
That's not at all unusual, is it?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:15 pm
@msolga,
nor would it be unusual for those very same countries which are arming the rebels and thus making civil war possible to be bleating on about "OMG! there is a war and killing going on in Syria, we must do something!"
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:17 pm
@hawkeye10,
That wouldn't surprise me, either.
You'll find the arms suppliers making a tidy little profit whenever there's the opportunity.
It will certainly be interesting to learn who they are in this case.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:31 pm
@msolga,
We know who is paying the bills, which is all that matters....the Saudi's and other Sunni's.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:43 pm
@msolga,
Unlike Gadhafi, True War Criminal Saakashvili Welcomed By U.S. Hypocritical Power Elite

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ChNk8Dhc40

Quote:
War crimes wash off with West's help - You would think if a leader commits atrocities, he would be denounced, banned from travel, but history shows, that is not the way politics works: in August 2008, the Georgian president Mikhail Saakashvili killed scores of civilians and Russian peacekeepers stationed in South Ossetia for 20 years, but was exonerated by the West. Politicians accept him as a friend, business leaders are looking to invest in his country and it seems the US is happy to continue turning a blind eye to the blood on Saakasvili's hands
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2012 09:44 pm
@hawkeye10,
No, I think knowing who is profiting from supplying arms to the Syrians , compared to what their governments are saying, matters a lot, too.
Not just knowing who provides the funding for a civil war to occur.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Thu 12 Jul, 2012 12:33 pm
Quote:
WIKILEAKS PRESS RELEASE: Victory in the first court case in the fight against the imfamous Wikileaks banking blockade.

Thu Jul 12 13:55:40 UTC 2012

In a case against Valitor, formerly VISA Iceland, Reykjavík District Court just ruled the company had violated contract laws by blocking credit card donations to Wikileaks. After WikiLeaks' publications revealing U.S. war crimes and statecraft in 2010, U.S. financial institutions, including VISA, MasterCard, Bank of America, erected a banking blockade against WikiLeaks wholly outside of any judicial or administrative process. The blockade stripped away over 95% of donations from supporters of WikiLeaks, costing the organization in excess of USD 20M.

The court ruled that the donation gateway should be reopened within 14 days otherwise Valitor will be penalized with a fine of 800 000 ISK daily. WikiLeaks is persuing several actions against the blockade and a European Commission preliminary investigation into the blockade was started last July. A Commission decision on whether to pursue the financial services companies involved in the blockade is expected before the end of August.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said "This is a significant victory against Washington's attempt to silence WikiLeaks. We will not be silenced. Economic censorship is censorship. It is wrong. When it's done outside of the rule of law its doubly wrong. One by one those involved in the attempted censorship of WikiLeaks will find themselves on the wrong side of history."

For more information on the WikiLeaks banking blockade see http://wikileaks.org/Banking-Blockade

For WikiLeaks press contacts see http://wikileaks.org/Press
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Thu 12 Jul, 2012 07:32 pm
@hingehead,
Hooray for that Icelandic District Court.

Boooooooooo to VISA, MasterCard, Bank of America and those other US financial crooks.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2012 10:26 am
The violence in Syria is overwhelming. The release of hacked e-mails may add to the violence.
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2012 07:03 pm
@wandeljw,
It may also force other nations to cooperate and the regime to concede.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 01:23:24