"Fun" as an adjective

Tags: English
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Read Discussion
Reply to All

McTag wrote:

Good point. I think used like that, it is an adjective. Gosh. But I would never write "a fun party", and I cannot exactly say why. Maybe just usage.

But my sons use it, and they are not uneducated just young - it is the American influence I think. They also use 'he was like' instead of 'he said'. Odd.

0 Replies

On the other hand, it may still be a noun:

That party was fun
The Lord is King
One mistake could be sudden death

Eh?

0 Replies

Yep, it could. I think it comes down to the definitions we use for adjectives and nouns. Locked into Latin grammar with a non-Latin language. If it can't be compared or modified, it probably should be classified a noun - though someone earlier in this thread said they'd heard funner! You may be able to get junker food than McD's (or probably not) but only as a nonce word, I imagine.

0 Replies

You can say 'His party was more fun than mine' but not the Lord is more king than Charles I.
And sudden death is a noun phrase - although you could say, I suppose, that falling off a high cliff could be A more sudden death than eating at McDs every day.

I must get back to writing the grammar books that is my work!

0 Replies

And

The party was fun
The party was great fun
The party was a lot of fun

Nouns, I think.

0 Replies

Yes.

0 Replies

We need to bear in mind the difference between spoken and written language, and how formal the context is. I could certainly say, "The party was fun" and even "We had a fun time." But I also say "ain't" when it suits me.

Wouldn't use that language in a formal written communication, though...

0 Replies

Too right D'Artagnan, mon brave mousquetier - but it's interesting how posts here, and emails, are bridging the gap between spoken and written.. I have a (pedantic) friend who distinguishes between letters, which he may send by email, and emails, which aren't the same thing at all. Hmmm. And we have Smile

but I suppose people always did drawings in the margins of letters.

0 Replies

Agreed, Clary. I may be on the same wave length as that friend of yours; I have a friend with whom I've corresponded for years (mainly via snail mail), and we've evolved our own protocols re appropriate language...

0 Replies

fun, funner, funnest makes me sick, sicker sickest. I will never accept it and where I read it I will read no more.

0 Replies

Well, as I said in the "funner" thread, grammar changes over time. Nouns frequently turn into adjectives, adjectives turn into nouns, and simple grammatical rules such as the "-er/-est"-ending to adjectives find new uses over time.

If the word "fun" itself survive itself, we might see "funner" as a natural part of the English language in 20-40 years, and people might get sickest from seeing it as a noun instead.

0 Replies

Funner and funnest are sloppy - they should be more and most fun. But I have no problem with "the party was fun" or "the fun party" or "the party was so fun" just as I have no problem with split infinitives. English teachers need to get with the picture...

0 Replies

Sloppiness is often what drives the language forward. Why should one see it as especially noble that one's language is unneccessarily complicated? That's just so unfunnest.

0 Replies

Even if unfunnest was a word, that's grammatically incorrect - by the current rules, I suppose.

0 Replies

Even if unfunniest were a word.

Owned.

0 Replies

Anyone can say or write whatever he or she wants. And, I suppose, if you want to predict what will be acceptable grammar 50 or 500 years from now, that's OK, too.

It would be a bit like driving your car 100 mph, then telling the cop who pulls you over that it's OK, in 50 years, 100 will be the speed limit. I doubt he'll buy that argument, but it's worth a try...

0 Replies

Hee hee hee

I don't think it's sloppiness which drives change, exactly, though no doubt it plays a part; I think it's more to do with desire for brevity and simplicity.
(Although Americans say "momentarily" when they mean currently, and "at this time" when they mean now, so who knows. Smile

0 Replies

The thing about langauge, is, if you use a nonstandard word when talking to your friends, your English teacher isn't going to show up to your house and bill you. Or, maybe you're did...

0 Replies

Nonstandard when I'm "at home" is differnt from how I communicate to strangers... frinstance, I don't object (too much) to typos in casual emails, but I would object mightily to mistakes in a business letter...

But I will never, and I exhort others to never, use "funner" or "funnest". Ever.

0 Replies

Read Discussion
Reply to All

"Fun" as an adjective

Related Topics