@Olivier5,
He said that "anti-theism" dates to the 18th century--you denied this in an earlier post, and then quoted it in your previous post addressed to me. As i've pointed out, i've shown evidence of it from long before, centuries before the 18th century.
Basically, what we have going on here is your usual idiot measure of comprehension. If someone doesn't agree with your point of view, then they don't understand. That's arrogant and hubristic. I understand the article, and you silly arguments. I don't agree. That i don't agree
is not evidence that i don't understand
Don't lecture me on what words and phrases mean in English. Your paltry abilities in English don't warrant it.
Once again, i understand what he wrote, i just don't agree with him.
Look at the end of the article, and it provides the real understanding of that sad little screed he produced. He's the knight in shining armor, coming to the defense of poor, beleaguered religions.
But what he is really doing, is touting his latest book, which, unsurprisingly, he hopes will sell well.
He suckered one of us here, Olive Tree.