Atheism

You have yet to answer my one and only question.

The only questions you've answered were the ones establishing that I was quoting you directly, not the question I asked about what I quoted from you.

There's a skip in the record.

Yeah, they actually are. Every last one of them is a blind guess.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Yeah, they actually are. Every last one of them is a blind guess.

     The very fact that you are mentally unable to see the interpretations of the phenomenology does not necessarily mean that they are 'blind guesses'. You don't know what color you will have when you mix black & white, but are talking frivolously about 'blind guesses'. As you are such a great visionary, why don't you explain to us what are the guesses underlying the Big Bang and the Evolution 'theories'. You are resenting from the Church, but you are not to far away from their considerations.
     You don't believe in the Big Bang and Evolution, but you believe in Money and Power from where automatically follows that you cannot stop confirming and reconfirming those two 'theories' in compliance with your personal beliefs.

I do not have any "beliefs."

Here then, the central premise of Hitchens’ argument is worthy of reiteration. Had Stalin inherited a purely rational secular edifice, one established upon the ethos espoused by the likes of Lucretius, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Einstein and other free thinking and rational secularists, then the apologist’s argument would hold slightly more weight, but such wasn’t the case. Stalin merely tore the existing religious labels off the Christian Inquisition, the enforcement of Christian orthodoxy, the Crusades, the praising of the priesthood, messianism, and Edenic ideas of a terrestrial religious-styled utopia, and re-branded them with the red of communism. Had this Christian machine not been in place, then it is more than likely Stalin wouldn’t have had the vehicle he needed to succeed in causing so much suffering in the name of his godless religion, Communism.