@Frank Apisa,
Rating your own exam papers is your problem, not mine. as Spendi rightly pointed out, you do so all the time.
I base my "scoring" on the behaviour of the other poster, as follows:
- if he concedes defeat, you win.
- if he leaves the discussion in a nervous breakdown, ranting that your are now on his ignore list, you win by forfeit.
- if he leaves the board for several weeks or months right after the debate, it's a good indication you won big time (but you lost a debater....)
- if your debater cannot address your argument in any way, especially if that argument is left ignored even though you have stated it several times, you win by forfeit.
The last criteria is more subjective but as an example of such defeat I offer your incapacity to address my point that according to you everything is a guess, and to address my list of 5 guesses you made while speculating on my nationality and the shape and nature of my genitals. You just can't address that, to the best of your ability, and thus you lose that argument.