i was using a biological standard only
Your satandards are low, dj.
You have a hell of standards, MA..
Humanly, we cannot ask for more than that..
mea Equus caballus Gluteus Maximus
. . . and the horse you rode in on, too!!
i think that's a different thread
Merry Andrew wrote:
I'm shocked -- shocked, I tell you! -- to see that some of you are actually taking this racist bitch seriously enough to actually comment on her threads. I don't have her on 'ignore'; it's amusing to read her racist crap from gtime to time. But, as a rule, I try to ignore her screeds to the point of never answering any of them nor commenting on her sad attitude.
OK, I 'll answer her, if I think of anything significant to offer.
What do you hope to achieve ??
Wow. How come you post all this stuff Pamela??
I remember you from long ago when I posted a thread asking about some information about some goings-on in a certain African country.
Do you live in Africa?
David 's Tips On (almost) Ending Violent Crime:
1. End all gun control laws & encourage all possible future victims
to arm themselves with their weapons of choice, take lessons in tactical defense
and practice, practice, practice defensive skills n accuracy of marksmanship.
Establish it clearly in the law
that no civil liability nor criminal liability can arise
from acts of self defense, including defense of property.
2. Return to Americanism by repealing all anti-drug laws,
restoring the status quo ante c.1900. Educate the public
in schools qua the evils of slavery to chemistry.
3. Stop releasing violently recidivistic felons back into contact
with the decent people; instead, BANISH violently recidivistic felons
from the North American Continent, enforcible on pain of death,
after taking their pictures, fingerprints, retinal scans & DNA.
sadly you're considered a human being by most standards
As if ad hominem
mud slinging makes YOU
If u can 't disprove the message, attack the messenger
, right, djjd ?
and the horse he rode in on
i have no problem with people who are disgusted by or make comments about crime, but pamela is obsessed with black on white crime, if she said all criminals are evil that would be one thing, but she focuses on blacks only, that's despicable
i've also made it quite clear that i'm a prick who likes to needle people about a variety of things
pamela has been called out on her racism, asked to explain where it comes from, she continually ignores the challenge, she's a coward
i have no problem with people who are disgusted by or make comments about crime,
but pamela is obsessed with black on white crime, if she said all criminals are evil that
would be one thing, but she focuses on blacks only, that's despicable
Then Y not explain your opinions on that point DIRECTLY
, on the merits
rather than deviating into personal, off-topic evalutions of the messenger?
she continually ignores the challenge, she's a coward
No man! She's decided to ignore you. So big Bob get on with your very dull life.
using the ignore button is cowardly, i had one person (cjhsa) on ignore for about 3 hours one time (after the election), thought better of it and never have never used the button again, there is always something to be learned, even if it's only how dull, or petty or fucked up i, er, i mean someone can be