0
   

numbers were stratospheric?

 
 
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 05:51 am
numbers were stratospheric = numbers increased dramatically?
Context:
Although no incidents of swine flu in North Korea have been officially reported, and it is unlikely that the authorities would report them in any case unless numbers were stratospheric, it is true that there is a high possibility of an explosive outbreak in a destitute country such as North Korea.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link/Embed
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 75 • Replies: 3

 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 07:25 am
It means "very, very high". Not necessarily "increased dramatically", just very high.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 07:44 am
Yes, that's it.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Oct, 2009 07:02 pm
Thank you both
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
what's the meaning of the sentence? - Question by grace-g
meaning of second paragraph - Question by tanguatlay
Affect vs. Effect. - Discussion by Anonymous
English is a messed up language... - Discussion by Monger
Jumping Jehosaphat - Discussion by Equus
What's Your No. 1 Grammar Pet Peeve? - Discussion by dupre
Why it takes awhile to understand English!! - Discussion by the reincarnation of suzy
present perfect - Discussion by bmo
 
  1. able2know
  2. » numbers were stratospheric?
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.34 seconds on 11/22/2009 at 07:50:57 Top End