Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 05:43 pm
there are those (and there are many of them) that think repressed memories need to be recalled in order for someone to get and maintain self-actualization. I'm thinking that's really bullshit and that one's ability to manage memories (repressing) is essential to functioning as a human being.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link/Embed
Type: Discussion • Score: 23 • Views: 1,969 • Replies: 148

 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 06:05 pm
I read one time that that is the Japanese approach.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 06:52 pm
So . . . what? We should just stuff it down forever?
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 06:55 pm
i'm not big on leaving that stuff lie forever undigested, but i don't got any letters behind my name, either...



rockhead phd.
(nope, don't even sound right)
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 06:56 pm
I've read articles that agree with you, Dys.

There has been much written about repressed memory seeking, pro and con and, no doubt, in between.
I simply don't know, myself.

On myself, I do have flash memories but they are usually benign, or memorable for some comeuppance, like Mrs. McNulty yelling at me..
I think I've been spared, or I am repressed as hell. This is not to make light, I figure coping mechanisms for real trauma are complicated, and I'm not a psychologist. There certainly are accusations of psychologists feeding a repressed memory scenario for various reasons. On the other hand, it is probably a common coping behavior. I dunno.
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 07:01 pm
Your point that repression can work, I do see that point of view - while I also see the airing view, given the memories are spot on.
0 Replies
 
  2  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 08:33 pm
Quote:
So . . . what? We should just stuff it down forever?


You aren't going to live forever.
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 08:34 pm
Well reasoned! Smile
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 08:45 pm
What's well reasoned?
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 09:04 pm
I'll be bald,
dys is working up his point of view.
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 09:22 pm
I agree totally. Also, there's nothing wrong with being in denial about certain sorts of things. *

There are certain things, in fact, which I remember and wish very much that I could repress. No, it will not make me a better person to dredge up stuff that's better off unrecalled.

*That particular idea (re: denial) was mentioned to me once by, believe it or not, a psychotherapist.
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 09:28 pm
so Diane doesn't get to talk?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Oct, 2009 10:13 pm
Quote:
What's well reasoned?

You wrote ...
Quote:
You aren't going to live forever.

My statement wasn't meant as a sarcastic remark but an earnest statement.

Many new theories claim that memory and forgetfulness (or in this case repression) is an evolutionary step to help a individuals to surpass certain tragedies or painful events. The developed neurological talent to repress those memories obviously wouldn't be a positive thing if one lived forever as these negative memories are bound to arise in a hypothetical immortal individual.
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 02:53 am

Figuratively speaking, time heals all wounds,
BUT the wound must be clean for this to occur.
That involves bringing it up to the surface, in my experience.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Letty
 
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 03:31 am
Maslow's theory.

http://deptorg.knox.edu/engdept/commonroom/Volume_Eleven/number_two/Wedel/maslow.gif
0 Replies
 
View Profile djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 06:43 am
Merry Andrew wrote:
I agree totally. Also, there's nothing wrong with being in denial about certain sorts of things. *


i console myself with this simple mantra "i was only following orders"
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 11:58 am
A misconception about repressed memories, is that the person is always aware they exist. Some repressed memories exist in a state where person can recall details, but only as if it was story told to them. In this case, they are aware of the memory, but experience it in second or third person. In other cases, the person may be completely unaware of the memory at all. Probably due to an absence of people or reminders of the memory around them.

T
K
O
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 12:06 pm
absolutely agree.
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 12:21 pm
The whole notion of "repressed memory" is a myth, based on half-baked Freudianism and foisted on the public by charlatans, cranks, impostors, and their easily gulled dupes.
0 Replies
 
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Oct, 2009 12:24 pm
I started this thread following a discussion I had with the Lady Diane when she asked me why I didn't have PTSD even though I had been in combat. I responded that I decided many many years ago to forget (repress) those memories and whatever memories I did have were about someone else, certainly not the me I am today. I quite firmly believe that this "repression" is mentally healthy and does not in any way indicate avoidance of history that I should rehash over and over again. It is all best if forgotten.
 

Related Topics

What makes people vote Republican? - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
What sex is your brain? Take this Sex I.D test. - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Psychology: Interview - Question by zamoraq
Need answer to riddle - Question by wmreda
Musical Imagery - Discussion by The Pentacle Queen
Can we compare physics and psychology? - Discussion by coberst
Numbers Mind Game - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Book: Sex used to break Muslim prisoners - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Need Help For Science Biology Paper. Help! - Question by livelaughlove939
 
  1. able2know
  2. » repressed memories
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.33 seconds on 11/21/2009 at 11:52:32 Top End