@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:
I'm sorry, but you should really re-write that intro. It should read, "As a knee-jerk, fraidy-cat pansy terrified of exposing my children to an articulate leader who I'm scared will undermine my 6-18 years of parenting in less than an hour, it wasn't the President's speech that caused me to pee my pants as much as the idea my children might come to think for themselves...."
Whatever benefits the President's talk can have with students, I do not understand why the same benefits cannot be obtained by the regular educational system? In other words, in my opinion, the message may be that teachers cannot instill the same motivation in students as a very important national figure might be able to. What does that say about society? The cult of celebrity is the way to teach?
Notice, the President's wife is not giving the speech. Does this mean there is a particular problem with motivating male students? Perhaps, too few male students have adequate male role models? Then I would value having someone speaking to male students that can talk about how he (whoever) valued the male role model he had from his Dad, and how young male students should realize that one day they too can be a good male role model for their children. By the way, the President did not have a good male role model in his youth. Perhaps, he does not qualify for this effort, if some professional opinions were solicited?