Reply
Sun 30 Aug, 2009 01:43 am
Okay girls and guys what are the pros and cons of the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong? I honestly want to know both in terms of comfort to the wearing and the visual sex appeal what are the opinions of both guys and girls?
Low is far better, in the back it frames the orbs of the buttocks and in the front it gives the tease of maybe getting to see something. The best is using low rise and having a tattoo just above it, or mostly above it.
I think that thongs, low, high or just plain intermediate, are soooo tacky and last year.
I agree with contrex - the sexy thing to wear are "cheekies"
contrex wrote:I think that thongs, low, high or just plain intermediate, are soooo tacky and last year.
around here, it's more like last century then last year
thongs were popular 1997 - 1999, pretty much out of favour by 2000/2001 . pretty much tacky trash if someone is still wearing skivvies that are 10 years out of date
I always wonder about when they - you know, ride up in the crack, do they get sort of stained?
they look uncomfortable. I'd be trying to pull them down over my butt all day.
I wore a thong just one time. really uncomfortable.
I'm into feeling comfortable in what I'm wearing. It's not like I'm prancing around showing everyone my panties all day.
If someone else wanted me to wear them, I'd say "after you"
In England the thong took off more during the fade phase then in America, and then sales fell below that of America, so culture does matter. However, the thong is here to stay. It looks fabulous on certain women, it is erotically appealing, and it is a solution for panty lines. I think that a lot of thong wearing has always been and will continue to be motivated by women trying to please men, which I am all in favor of.
i love a women in boy/boxer shorts, and a tank top
or better yet commando wearing pajama pants
wait a minute is this a fantasy thread or general information
Believe it or not, chai, these "cheekies" are so comfortable, you don't even
feel that you're wearing them. Even under pants you don't see a thing as
the usual panty lines are absent.
I have no desire for a thong. I like other forms of undergarments much better. The cheekys are really hot but come hanky pany I'm going to second the pajama pants in commando form.
Thongs, as I understood, used to be more of a flashy thing. More recently they have been made into a no-panty-line-showing-in-your-black-slacks kind of thing. I know plenty of women who wear them, and I don't think that many of them do it for their guy.
However, I know a few of the same women who use that fact against their boyfriends. They pretend like they don't want to wear it, but would wear it any ways for the panty line thing. It's used to leverage things like taking out trash etc.
Women have the far superior mind when it comes to strategy and agenda. Us guys, don't really stand a chance do we?
T
K
O
Is there not a danger of "camel toe"?
Quote:They pretend like they don't want to wear it, but would wear it any ways for the panty line thing. It's used to leverage things like taking out trash etc.
very true, however I am surprised that you can get past your politics and embrace the truth. Bravo!
Quote:Us guys, don't really stand a chance do we?
Oh please, our poor performance is by choice. This will change, women are quickly tiring of chicken shit men that they can easily manipulate. Most women want their men to be a challenge, at least.
It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.
Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong?
Granted the photos I have here are not equivocal, yet all things being equal what's the opinion on low rise verses waist high thongs? Both for sexiness and comfort.
Muarck wrote:
It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.
you're correct. If I had to choose, it would be the low rise. The high rise is kind of 90's'ish.
T
K
O
Quote:It's kind of funny I believe Hawkeye10 is actually the only person who really answered the question: Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong, although there was/is a lot of interesting discussion, Hawkeye10 was the only one who discussed the Low Rise Thong vs. Waist High Thong.
that happens some what often around here, as everyone else seems to feel the need to throw their moral values around and attempt to bully others into conforming to their proclivities. I take people as they are most of the time, I trust individuals to run their own lives. I see my role is to help others get what they want, and leave judgements about what they want aside........much of the time anyways.
And I am vilified as being immoral as a result.
hawkeye10 wrote:And I am vilified as being immoral as a result.
Yes, that's why you promote marital rape and other despicable ideas to demean
women.
Quote: I always wonder about when they - you know, ride up in the crack, do they get sort of stained?
You should always floss your butt once a day
Quote:Yes, that's why you promote marital rape and other despicable ideas to demean
women.
My argument is that the sex laws are not compatible with human sexuality, that the law making process has been hijacked by militant gender political forces who are attempting to use sex law to change human sexuality to meet the fantasy they hold about how men and women should interact. They will fail, and all attempts to make humans act in inhuman ways demeans both men and women.
You keep bitching about my opinion, but I never see you arguing against it.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace
