0
   

Not only gentlemen prefer blondes

 
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 08:45 am
Quote:
Far be it from me to defend Setanta. But, just what TRUTH are to talking about? Anybody with a smidgeon of intelligence can read that it is not an elephant issue, but a black & white issue.

Are you so naive as to think otherwise? Do you actually think she would have posted if the black & roles were reversed in this story


The motivation of the one speaking is not relevant, the only thing that is relevant is the degree of truth of that what is spoken. I don't know what idea our original poster is trying to advance, it could however be that animals (to include man) are driven by soul not intellect and across species respond to physical beauty. What is highly offensive is the claim by Set that anyone or any animal that evaluates beauty with consideration to racial variations is a racist. Whether it is consciously done or subconsciously done we all evaluate beauty based in part on racial variation, so using his definition we are all racists. As with the term bigot the racist tag as used at a2k has lost all meaning except to tar those who are unwilling to conform (pretend to conform actually) to the a2k groupthink.

I suspect that Set is not the idiot that he pretends to be, that he actually knows that racial qualities impact the beauty evaluation and that he further knows that humans at least respond more favorably toward those who are beautiful. In which case he knows that the only difference between those who say so and thus get his abuse and those who don't is the willingness to speak truth. That Set abuses the ones who have the gall to speak that which he does not what to hear and does not want to deal with, as if he were a three year old.
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 09:15 am
Your post is even more idiotic than usual. You have absolutely no clue as to what the thread is about and are trying to impart your own immoral character on others.

I guess, according to your post, that your motivation when it comes to women does not matter as long as you think it is the truth what you are doing.
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 09:45 am
Quote:
Your post is even more idiotic than usual. You have absolutely no clue as to what the thread is about and are trying to impart your own immoral character on others.


threads are about different things to different people, you show yourself when you assume that everyone takes away the same experience that you do. You further show yourself to be willing to attempt to bend reality to suit your morality (ego). Morality has no place in the process of the discovery of the truth. Science understands this, and getting this goes far in explaining why science has been successful. Religion's do not (with a few exceptions), which goes far in explaining why they have lost power.

You Intrepid can make yourself feel better by clinging to your morality, and attempting to get others to adopt your morality, but in the end you lose. This practice keeps you ignorant, shielded from reality.
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 10:03 am
Quote:
You Intrepid can make yourself feel better by clinging to your morality, and attempting to get others to adopt your morality, but in the end you lose. This practice keeps you ignorant, shielded from reality


I should add that morality is critically important in the process of deciding what to do, in deciding in which direction we are going to attempt to drive our behaviour. We are who we are, and so the soul may not allow the ego to drive us where the ego wants to go, but morality (ego) does have a place in the process.

The ego slits it own neck when it refuses to know what is, when it uses morality as a screen to sift out that which it does not want to deal with. This is seen abundantly with Set, and you Intrepid have at least a touch of this affliction as well.
0 Replies
 
View Profile aidan
 
  2  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 04:51 pm
Pamela, Pamela, Pamela....this one is your piece de resistance - I've been laughing for five minutes now- if I'd only known what a wonderfully cleansing and sustained laugh I'd get, I'd have checked out this thread when it was first posted. I figured it'd be something depressing and disgusting like minority men raping blonde South African kids in a non-gentlemanly way or something...but I misjudged you -you're full of surprises.

But after I stopped laughing - at your ludicrous premise and those ridiculous photographs- all five of the top model wanna-bes - I started thinking and these are two of my questions:
a) what woman would want an elephant to be drawn or attracted to her-? You're a blonde, right - I think you told me that once. Does it make you feel special to know an elephant would tolerate you on its back moreso than other women?
b) Elephants are native to very hot countries in Asia and Africa where the people are dark-skinned (more melanin to help protect their skin from the harmful effects of the sun).
Elephants are noted for their intelligence and memory - right? Do you think they might remember that they were traditionally tamed and domesticated or hunted by dark-skinned people (sort of a latent dna muscle memory) and so they're naturally more afraid or uncomfortable around darker skinned people?

What do you think of my theory?

Even if you don't answer - absolutely fascinating and thanks for the laugh...
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 05:14 pm
at least you have a real response, not the customary a2k evasion....
View Profile aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 05:21 pm
I'm not much into evasion.
I did laugh so hard at those pictures though and that premise - I can't even tell you - I think Pamela Rosa is fascinating - and pretty smart I'd hazard to guess.

I also think my theory is viable though. And I'd never think of any of this stuff without her to spur me on.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 05:37 pm
How do you explain away the fact that most have taken it the same way?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 05:48 pm
Elephants live in hot countries. Right? And most females in hot countries are black. So experience has taught elephants that girls are too tight.

But white girls they have no experience of.

So--as hope springs eternal--elephants could be expected to prefer white girls on the off chance. Like Lexington Steele seems to do.
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 05:51 pm
Makes one wonder how the elephant responded to any white men on the shoot. Too funny.
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 05:54 pm
Elephant chuckles I should think and sardonic drolleries.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Jul, 2009 07:06 pm
The elephant might have been trying to be extra nice to the white females, since the elephant may have thought that they looked sort of anemic, in comparison to females of color? Perhaps, this was an exhibition of elephant empathy?
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Jul, 2009 02:06 pm
I think I remember reading that the three biggest salmon every caught in Scotland using a rod and line were all caught by white ladies of a certain age and education.

The scientists said that the fish, male, jumped upon the hook.
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jul, 2009 03:16 pm
Dawkins is a seeyouentee. I don't anticipate his name ever appearing in any Honours List.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Sep, 2009 07:52 am
Quote:
Today he's home in Woodside, recuperating from serious injuries. A little more than a month ago, Silicon Valley billionaire Tom Siebel was in the Serengeti, where a charging elephant attacked him and a guide.

"It was all happening so fast. There was no place to hide, no place to run," the 56-year-old Siebel, founder of the Siebel Systems software company, told the Mercury News in an exclusive interview Wednesday.

The elephant plowed into the guide and then turned on Siebel, breaking several ribs, goring him in the left leg and crushing the right. Siebel said they were able to radio for help only after the animal lost interest and wandered away, but it was three hours before he received any medical treatment.

Siebel sold his business to Oracle four years ago and now divides his time between his Woodside home, an office in Palo Alto and a ranch in Montana, where he raises cattle and competes in team roping events. He said he was on a photo safari in Tanzania last month when the elephant attacked without warning.

Early on the morning of Aug. 1, Siebel said, he and a guide went to a watering hole, where they hoped to observe a variety of game that were known to gather in the quiet early morning hours. They were watching a group of elephants from 200 yards away — "keeping a respectful distance," Siebel said — when one turned and without warning began to charge.

"There was no apparent reason, nothing that should
have made it feel threatened," Siebel said. "It was quiet, and then the quiet stopped," when the elephant began thundering toward the two men.

As the massive animal closed the distance, Siebel said the guide fired a gun but missed. Siebel said he was trampled and gored in the leg, until he just "curled into as tight a ball as I could."
The guide suffered broken ribs and other injuries.
After the animal left and the men called for help, rescuers came and eventually airlifted Siebel to Nairobi, where he received emergency care before flying back to California for more treatment. All told, he said, he spent 18 days in four hospitals before he was allowed to go home.

Siebel has been using a wheelchair but has told friends he expects to make a full recovery, after reconstructive surgery and physical therapy.

"I was very fortunate to have survived something you might not think was survivable," he said cheerfully Wednesday. "But I am home now, and with my family. It makes you glad to be home."

Siebel has not discussed the incident publicly before now. He said Wednesday that he was not eager for publicity about the experience but agreed to describe what happened after the Mercury News contacted him to confirm an account that was circulating in the community.

A veteran software executive, Siebel has kept a relatively low profile in the business world while investing his assets through a holding company called First Virtual Group. He has made a bigger splash with his nonprofit, the Thomas and Stacey Siebel Foundation, and by helping to fund alternative energy research and an anti-methamphetamine campaign that has been adopted by several rural states. BusinessWeek magazine included him in a 2008 ranking of the 50 most generous philanthropists in the country.

Siebel said Wednesday that he doesn't know what became of the elephant that attacked him. He said authorities in Tanzania searched for it, but as far as he knows it was never found.

While he's doing some work from home, he said, he's focused on his recovery. "My job is to get healthy and get over it," he said, "and I'm going to do my job."

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_13256318?IADID=Search-www.mercurynews.com-www.mercurynews.com&nclick_check=1


Next time Mr Siebel if you want to see elephants, go there with w nice blond girl, or go to the ZOO .......or look at your party's logo.
Very Happy
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Fear of a Black President - Discussion by snood
Pre Osama bin Biden Sale - Discussion by cjhsa
DC Shooting at Holocaust Museum - Discussion by Diest TKO
True Republican thought - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.33 seconds on 11/22/2009 at 06:56:26 Top End