You might consider reading what I wrote, including the word limited. Huh?
Oh, i did read what you wrote, and you're playing a game here, avoiding the most important part of my question. So let's review.
Merry Andrew wrote:
I suspect a rather gigantic amount of over-reaction. Go tell Henny Penny the sky is falling.
In response to which . . .
I don't know. There is a certain perception of the Obama administration, which I think is justified. I think the ability of a president to control congress - even when of the same party is limited.
So, regardless of the word limited, that means you think that Mr. Obama can exercise some control over Congress. I see no good reason to assume that any president can exercise any control over Congress, other than Congress determining on its own to cooperate.
But what you are trying to dodge here is an apparent conslusion on your part that you need guns and ammunition because of "a certain perception of the Obama administration" which you think is justified. Do you seriously expect that you will need firearms to protect yourself from this administration? Do you seriously think that if the FBI or the ATF came for you, you'd be able to handle the situation with your Smith and Wesson?
Like i said, Twilight Zone . . .