View Profile Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 03:41 pm
Its racist against KKK members - I dont know why but that is what Set told me.
View Profile mismi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 03:44 pm
thank goodness...I was wondering what other can of worms I had opened...really must learn restraint.
0 Replies
 
View Profile chai2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 04:25 pm
Ticomaya wrote:

Take a deep breath, Chai ... and perhaps a valium.


mommy, look at the funny man.

he's saying silly things.
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 05:03 pm
Did you take the blue pill or the red pill?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Feb, 2009 05:47 pm
LOL....

T
K
O
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 03:32 am
Quote:
Murdoch apologized Tuesday.

"Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended, and even insulted," according to the statement from Murdoch, who is also chairman and CEO of News Corporation, which owns the paper.

"I can assure you -- without a doubt -- that the only intent of that cartoon was to mock a badly written piece of legislation.

"It was not meant to be racist, but unfortunately, it was interpreted by many as such. We all hold the readers of the New York Post in high regard, and I promise you that we will seek to be more attuned to the sensitivities of our community."

Leaders of the NAACP on Saturday called for the firing of Delonas.

Delonas called the controversy "absolutely friggin' ridiculous."



http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/25/chimp.cartoon.sharpton/index.html

Apologizing to these whack jobs is OFFENSIVE.
View Profile aidan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 03:42 am
Does anyone know if Obama has made any response to the cartoon?
(I looked - but couldn't find anything specifically attributed to him).

*David - thanks for your encouragement a few pages back.
View Profile Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 05:28 am
And i was acknowledging the humor, Miss Mi.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 05:28 am
Liar.


Bite me.
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 07:18 am
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
Murdoch apologized Tuesday.

"Today I want to personally apologize to any reader who felt offended, and even insulted," according to the statement from Murdoch, who is also chairman and CEO of News Corporation, which owns the paper.

"I can assure you -- without a doubt -- that the only intent of that cartoon was to mock a badly written piece of legislation.

"It was not meant to be racist, but unfortunately, it was interpreted by many as such. We all hold the readers of the New York Post in high regard, and I promise you that we will seek to be more attuned to the sensitivities of our community."

Leaders of the NAACP on Saturday called for the firing of Delonas.

Delonas called the controversy "absolutely friggin' ridiculous."



http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/25/chimp.cartoon.sharpton/index.html

Apologizing to these whack jobs is OFFENSIVE.

SO STIPULATED.



David
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 07:25 am
Foxfyre wrote:

I already agreed with that. I thought the cartoon crude and insensitive,
and I didn't appreciate it, but not because it was racist as I do not believe it was racist in any way.

With all respect,
I gotta wonder: R we charged with being SENSITIVE ?

How did that happen ?

Did we take a vote ?





David
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 07:29 am
aidan wrote:

Does anyone know if Obama has made any response to the cartoon?
(I looked - but couldn't find anything specifically attributed to him).

*David - thanks for your encouragement a few pages back.

U r welcome.

I was wondering about censorship.

Did site management curtail what u can say ?

View Profile aidan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 08:41 am
Quote:
U r welcome.

I was wondering about censorship.

Did site management curtail what u can say ?

Not that I know of - I was sort of joking about being 'forbidden' to piggyback or quote someone.

But I'm really curious - has Obama said anything at all about the cartoon?
Do you know?
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 08:54 am
aidan wrote:

Quote:
U r welcome.

I was wondering about censorship.

Did site management curtail what u can say ?

Not that I know of - I was sort of joking about being 'forbidden' to piggyback or quote someone.

But I'm really curious - has Obama said anything at all about the cartoon?
Do you know?

I don 't.

Next time we meet: NO piggybacking !
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 08:55 am

Pork loin is OK, tho
0 Replies
 
View Profile aidan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 08:56 am
Laughing Laughing Laughing
Okay, I promise.

I think his take on the matter would be the most pertinent of all, certainly.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 08:59 am
This is bullshit, of course. I can't and didn't forbid you to do anything. I objected, and i will always object to someone using my post as a basis for responding to what someone else has said. I do not and never have objected to being quoted, saving only that i will reject comments on my quoted posts which entail things such as straw man arguments.

This post of yours is a perfect example--it is a straw man. One, because i did not attempt to and cannot forbid you to do anything; and two, because i did not object to and do not object to being quoted.
View Profile aidan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 09:02 am
I said I was joking.

View Profile aidan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 09:04 am
I mean really, Setanta - do I seem like the sort of persn whose gonna let someone forbid me to do something?
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Feb, 2009 09:08 am
aidan wrote:

I said I was joking.



OK; I will laff.


I think it is MORE pertinent what the AUTHOR of the cartoon has to say about it.





David
 

Related Topics

Fear of a Black President - Discussion by snood
Not only gentlemen prefer blondes - Discussion by Pamela Rosa
DC Shooting at Holocaust Museum - Discussion by Diest TKO
True Republican thought - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.35 seconds on 11/27/2009 at 06:15:54 Top End