12
   

Future of evolution

 
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Aug, 2009 06:13 pm
Most just want to muddy the issue so that no good information gets exchanged. Spendius is a prime example of that.
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2009 02:37 am
I prefer the full frontal hair-shirt Creationists than the ego driven tap dancers like spendi. They at least have some "religion" and they are more concerned with their beliefs as science than merely posting silly irrelevancies.
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2009 05:46 am
Quote:
I prefer the full frontal hair-shirt Creationists than the ego driven tap dancers like spendi. They at least have some "religion" and they are more concerned with their beliefs as science than merely posting silly irrelevancies.


Quote:
Most just want to muddy the issue so that no good information gets exchanged. Spendius is a prime example of that.


I don't insult the intelligence of A2Kers like those two glops of vanity do.

Could you explain effemm why you are less ego driven than I am. Your daily doings and self praise litter every thread you appear on. You hardly know a thing about me.

Even in little things you can't resist the macho symbol. A 9 hp engine is a "kicker" to you. To me it's a phut-phut of wet farts.

I invite readers to check out your post 3741919 on your "My holiday diary" thread to gain some idea of your self obsession and it isn't in the least unusual. You even see fit to inform us all that you went to sleep and then, goodness gracious, later woke up. We have been told endlessly what a Big Mon you are. Over and over again. You use the topics for no other reason.

And you sulk. (ignore). Sure sign of ego freaker.

But I feel complimented by "tap-dancer" but you need to know your Schopenhauer to understand why but I'm very well aware than you don't engage you mind with anything classy.

Your post is mere assertion. It means nothing. How can I be "irrelevant" when I'm the only one who is focussed on the social consequences of these debates and all they are to you are word games in which to preen. You seem to think that getting those girlish assertions in first gives them credibility. Anybody could say those things about anybody else.

Who cares what "you prefer"? What you prefer has nothing to do with the education of a nation's kids. What an inflated ego that "I prefer" conjures up. Even the whales only exist for you to have a trip on. I hope that one didn't hear you say it was "loping".

You patronise everything. The whole of creation seems to be a mirror in which you admire yourself.

Just look at your very silly answer to phoney's extremely apposite point. It's as if you are trying to drive intelligent people off A2K so you can shine better yourself. All you offered was a slimy sarcasm. Again with no meaning.

It's just the same with Ed. His assertions are just as pointless and insult A2Kers intelligence. These waters are already muddy. Anybody who isn't very bright might think from Ed's babyisms, which anybody also could blurt out in a fit of lip-trembling pique, that the waters are crystal clear and that I have the power to muddy them and render them opaque. What a load of crap. And just because Ed can't keep up an intellectual argument. And he's on the record concerning his daily doings too.

Pure philistinism the both and easily recognisable as such by anybody over 10. And neither of you can write worth a blow on a ragman's trumpet.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2009 03:30 pm
Quote:
And now let us more thoroughly investigate the matter. Egoism is a quality so deeply rooted in every personality that it is on egotistical ends only that one may safely rely in order to rouse the individual to activity.


Schopenauer

And here's me cant get out of before before 10,30 am, sits in a recliner reading, dozing and watching sport on TV and saunters to the pub for an hour on a barstool and getting accused of being egotistical by Mr Frenzied Activity his very self.

And compare our respective profiles.

And evolution ratifies my way of life.

It shows he uses words without understanding what they mean.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2009 03:36 pm
If only all that energy could be put to a constructive use, Spendi. What a waste.
  1  
Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2009 04:50 pm
We could get him one of those wheels they have for hamsters and connect it up to a turbine and bob's your uncle--clean energy.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Aug, 2009 12:23 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
Most just want to muddy the issue so that no good information gets exchanged.

That definitely seems to be part of the general strategy. Made worse by the fact that most Creationists don't even realize that they are being used simply to muddy the waters.
View Profile Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Aug, 2009 12:27 pm
I think that it can be reasonably assumed that most of the religiously motivated are sincere and honest. That makes it all the more despicable that those who are better educated and informed than the "flocks" are manipulating them. There is something particularly sinister about it, on a par with the televangelists who fleece them of their funds and then weep for the cameras if they are busted while enjoying their ill-gotten gains.
  0  
Reply Fri 28 Aug, 2009 12:37 pm
If only ros would give us a view of what unmuddied waters looked like in practice instead of all this effete posturing in which a certain pejoritive texture clings in his mind to the metaphors he so vainly deploys and which every fertile flood plain in the whole wide world provides objective proof of the literary desert within his ridiculous noggin.

Muddy waters are a sure sign of fertility and never moreso than when there are innundations of them.
0 Replies
 
  0  
Reply Fri 28 Aug, 2009 12:45 pm
And watch how Set distances himself from the "flocks" by the very simple and tried and tested expedient he has thought fit to regale us with as if only the select few have ever thought of his brilliant insight which was well wrung out over 2,500 years ago.

As if a few miscreants are proof of the stupidity of the sincere and honest religiously motivated who have thereby been patronised by his glib and shallow sentences.

He's just a snob. It's as simple as that.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Aug, 2009 03:09 pm
Setanta wrote:
I think that it can be reasonably assumed that most of the religiously motivated are sincere and honest. That makes it all the more despicable that those who are better educated and informed than the "flocks" are manipulating them. There is something particularly sinister about it, on a par with the televangelists who fleece them of their funds and then weep for the cameras if they are busted while enjoying their ill-gotten gains.

And I think even the ones fleecing their flocks are rationalizing their actions as a "necessary evil" to reach their goal (of imposing their belief system on everyone else ... for their own good of course).
  0  
Reply Fri 28 Aug, 2009 05:02 pm
I wonder if ros is going to continue spouting that stuff for the rest of his life. It seems such a shame. It never changes.

What a boring chap he is.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Aug, 2009 06:50 am
I wonder if smart squids will have religion 65 million years from now. I wonder if they will have squishy preachers telling them they were created in God's image. I wonder if they will be digging up fossil humans and saying how squid Jesus walked beside predator people (before the calamari was served).
  0  
Reply Sat 29 Aug, 2009 08:32 am
That's scraping the bottom of the barrel.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Aug, 2009 09:20 am
Squids will first have to develop opposable suckers.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Non-Evolution of Modern Man - Discussion by gungasnake
SINGLE CELL FOSSIL - Discussion by hamburger
Steven Gould and Uncle Don Carney - Discussion by gungasnake
Evolution!!! - Discussion by chezymeeez
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.34 seconds on 11/22/2009 at 01:38:19 Top End