0
   

loss of the Rose Art Museum

 
 
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 01:36 pm
It is to weep... or gnash teeth (in my opinion). I had a friend who was a literature prof at Brandeis for a while. If he hadn't already passed away in the nineties, this might kill him ---

LINK


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/02/02/arts/Rose2190.jpg
Erik Jacobs for The New York Times
One of the current exhibitions at the Rose Art Museum shows the work of the Abstract Expressionist Hans Hofmann.


In the Closing of Brandeis Museum, a Stark Statement of Priorities
By ROBERTA SMITH
Published: February 1, 2009

clip from article ---
WALTHAM, Mass. — Few things are more poignant than a gem of a museum whose days may be numbered. So it was at the Rose Art Museum at Brandeis University on a visit Friday, days after the university’s trustees voted unanimously to trash the institution by closing it and auctioning off the 6,000 works in its collection. The action came without consulting either the museum’s own board of governors or its director, Michael Rush.

The Brandeis vote was an act of breathtaking stealth and presumption: a raid on a museum that supports itself, raises its own funds and has consistently planned wisely for its own future without leaning on the university. The trustees treated it nonetheless as a disposable asset.
end/clip (longer article)


opinions?
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 02:08 pm
Very, very sad happening.

I always wonder why people like the trusties of Brandeis do the stealth thing like this? Why not just open it for discussion?

And considering the museum seemed to operate without being parasitic...what they thinking? The dollars obtained will be soon gone...and the art will be somewhere else.
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 02:36 pm
Agree.
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 02:38 pm
The real tragedy could easily be that some rich nabob buys up pieces of the collection...and as so many rich people do...puts them into bank vaults where the public will never see them.

Of course, they may also put them up on the walls of their homes...where the public will never see them anyway.

That is the possible tragedy.
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2009 03:10 pm
And, as the articles says, there are a lot of repercussions for the art department. But, the presumed loss of the public's chance to see the work is heartbreaking.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

artisitc inspiration? - Question by OGIONIK
Street Art - 3d chalk art - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Women through the Ages - Discussion by George
Art Quotes - Discussion by cobalt
The Fine Arts - What Genres Do You Include - Discussion by JoanneDorel
Killing a goldfish - art? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Portrait of Berenice Abbott - Discussion by Algis Kemezys
Anime/Manga - Discussion by unluckystar
 
  1. able2know
  2. » loss of the Rose Art Museum
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.35 seconds on 11/25/2009 at 04:44:46 Top End