Babble on, Bill, you still have failed to coherently address anything that i have actually written.
No surprises there, logic has never been your strong suit.
How can I now that you've backpedaled away from every topic relevant thing pretending you were kidding? Your one remaining point, that going faster doesn't get you there faster is too idiotic to require a rebuttal. Okay, here: Yes, it does. ) But wait; there's more... It so happens that if I left the office at 4:30 and blazed home at 80 mph; I would beat the Rush hour going through Milwaukee, thereby saving an additional 30 minutes of driving time. Well, what do you know? Going faster saved lots of time... who would have thought? 
Well, I think your average first grader can do the math that seemingly escapes you Setanta. Perhaps you should stick to History… so you won't look like such an idiot.
The studies (and there are a LOT of them out here in the transportation industry) are pretty clear - when you travel makes a lot more difference than your speed.
Bill, no one has said that it will get you there slower.
The 'dispute' is on whether or not the exponential increase in DEATH from accidents at higher speeds is worth the MINUTES you'll save on an average 15-20 mile commute.
I understand that you're a speeder, and I hope that you'll never get in an accident, but chances are you will, hopefully you love your family enough to realize that if you're going the speed limit when that accident occurs, as opposed to going 90mph you'll have a much greater chance of survival.
Is dying decades early (or causing someone else to die) worth that tiny amount of time?
Dude. Stop arguing and start thinking.
I NEVER made that claim you fool. READ what I've written.
And how would I be earning an extra weeks pay?
Please Bill, stop telling me to think when it's obvious that you're doing such a poor job of that on your own.
The person going the speed limit in the passing lane is not FORCING anyone to BREAK THE LAW or cause an unsafe condition. The speeder (in this case, you) are making that choice.
That's not thinking. That's pure idiocy. The Setantamantics that the person clogging up the road doesn't force others to pass him doesn't change the equation that a percentage of otherwise safe drivers WILL pass on the Right if some selfish asshole is clogging up the passing lane. This is a simple matter of fact… and only an idiot would attempt to deny it with silly semantic nonsense. 
