SELF-DEFENSE: SUCCESSFUL

While perpetrating violently criminal depredations,
the lives of the violent predators have ANTI-value;
the opposite of value.



No.
Its irrelevant to who is right or rong.


If he is perpetrating a robbery, then by definition, he is evil.
The victim 's rights remain the same, no matter what.





Because the destruction of the robber ends a violent threat from that man;
after he is interred, he will be deterred from further predatory violence
and we will all be safer for that fact. Let us cheer and celebrate!



That 's HIS tuff luck.
The predator 's state-of-mind has no effect upon
the victim 's rights of self-defense.

The criminal brought it on himself.

When u r defending yourself from the predatory violence
of man or beast, u must single-mindedly endeavor to destroy the enemy.
To take action, or restraint, for his benefit is suicidal and shoud be avoided.





David

That is terrible reasoning,
as applied to such a case as this,
in that preserving the life of a predator can very well have the effect
of exposing his future victims to the danger of his malice,
which woud not happen if he had previously been killed.
In other words,
if u protect the evil, then u condemn his future victims
and thay shoud blame YOU.





David

Gun safety fail.

Another way to express it is:
if u intentionally let a violently predatory criminal go free
(when u had the opportunity to kill him, during his violent crime)
that is like you shooting up the town, helter skelter,
shooting in all directions letting your innocent neighbors take their chances,
because in both cases, u r exposing them to unnecessary danger.





David

If I remember, the police officer shot himself that time.