Reply
Fri 14 Nov, 2008 09:11 pm
This is my PSA for the residents of Georgia.
Saxby Chambliss is the current Senator from Georgia and he has been forced into a Dec. 2nd runoff election.
Independents, Libertarians, Democrats and Republicans must turn out in large numbers and vote for Saxby Chambliss Tuesday, December 2nd.
because you can't have enough scumbag red clay georgia rednecks running around loose
I know you are an ignorant bigot and a racist, but did you have anything to say about the runoff?
I thought my post made my thoughts crystal clear....
You made it crystal clear that you are an ignorant bigot and a racist.
How so....and please be specific.....
this guy?
Chambliss Refusing to Speak in Imperial Sugar Case
I can certainly see why he wants to make it back into the Senate
Quote:Tate says attorneys for Chambliss claim he has immunity because he's a U.S. Senator.
"Our clients have said to reporters that they have felt like he was trying to influence them and dissuade them from filing lawsuits. That's the kind of activity a U.S. Senator does not enjoy privilege to conduct," explains Tate.
not sure why a voter would want to re-elect someone of this ilk, but each to his own
This guy Tate is an attorney desperate for attention.
The story is fluff.
And my PSA for the people of Georgia:
Let's see if we can't give Obama a veto-proof majority and get this country back on the right track after eight years of Bush misfeasance. Turn out one more slug from the Senate. Defeat Saxby Chambliss.
Max Cleland is an honorable man and an ex-senator. He is a triple amputee, due to his military service in Vietnam, yet Saxby Chambliss won his office by running a typical Republican slime campaign, swiftboating Cleland and questioning his patriotism. John McCain said of one of the ads Chambliss ran attacking Cleland, "it's worse than disgraceful, it's reprehensible". Show the country that slime doesn't work, Georgia, vote Chambliss out.
Chambliss was involved in the attacks on Cleland?
Fucking bastard.
Chambliss needs to go.
H20Man opposes a veto-proof majority. What better proof could we have that the veto-proof majority is something that's right for the country?
No need for bold 30-point type, H2O. We can recognize idiocy perfectly well at 12-point, and at least then it's not so blatant.
MontereyJack wrote:
We can recognize idiocy perfectly well at 12-point, and at least then it's not so blatant.
That's your fucking reflection MJ!
Nice try, H2O, but redirection never works because it's so obvious. When you can't come up with anything else, always throw in a "fucking", right?
Chambliss is a slimeball, he's shown that. Turn him out.
H2O MAN wrote:The "veto-proof majority" eliminates the two party system.
and yet the two party system makes such an event a possibility
maybe it's time for a third party
Nice fucking try, but you are wrong MJ.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace
