And I suppose what I would suggest, blatham, is that where someone (like you) holds something to be self-evidentially true (and holds it tightly out of some emotional or "philosophical necessity", like you do) than any evidence, no matter how specious, is considered self-evidently "true."
Sound familiar.
You really should be ashamed of yourself
Bernie.
You can very easily send a thrill up the legs of syncophants like Snoodley and Good Ole Dys, but I still expect more of you.
Perhaps I should not.
You linked to an article that measured media support of GOP candidates based on the percentage of
all news outlets that endorsed the GOP candidate.
In such a survey (as I am sure you know) The Rocky Mountain Conservative Gazette carries the same statistical value as the New York Times.
If you are the person I think you are, you know you are off base on this and yet you felt compelled to respond with insult rather than justification.
If you have any integrity at all you will tell me how this link supports your position that the Mainstream Media is not liberaly biased, instead of tossing off insults that Dys and Snood can climb aboard.
Hey, maybe it's all fun and games on A2K and I should continue referring to you as blatham rather than "Bernie," like those who seek to earn credit and recognition with you do.
If so, fine.
I'm happy to deal with blatham the cartoon.
