11
   

Obama Kool-Aide Drinkers? Right-wing Propaganda!

 
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 Oct, 2008 11:07 pm
Now here's the final word on the Expected One


0 Replies
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 28 Oct, 2008 01:43 pm
Did Finn get Dan Quayle (who is a rocket scientist compared to Palin BTW) to help compose his thread title?
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 07:41 pm
Ha ha, so funny!

What a rapier wit!

Is there some way to ignore, in advance, chooch replies such as nicole's?

The new improved A2K should have a rules based engine that either strips out these useless posts or, at least, alerts us to them.

Then again, can we rely on A2K's rules to recognize objectivity?
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 08:06 pm
You know about the ignore feature, right? Of course, it's user based and not content based, so don't know if it serves your purpose.
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 08:20 pm
Step One: Click "nicole415."
Step Two: Click "Ignore user"
Step Three: Thank "Robert" (when you bump into him)
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 08:26 pm
But how do I ignore nicole proactively?

(Of course I can't but that's what rhetorical questions are all about)
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 08:29 pm
You mean before you know that you want to ignore her? There's no technology for that yet. Otherwise you can click on her name and choose "Ignore User" as O'Bill says.

I'll give you a hint, I can see that you replied to her, but I have no idea what she said. And I like to keep it that way.
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 08:48 pm
No, there is technology for that.

It's rule based technology.

The problem is that people have to set the rules.

  1  
Reply Wed 29 Oct, 2008 09:01 pm
Would be nice to have the technology that would predict her next altie, and proactively ignore that incarnation.
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Oct, 2008 02:22 pm
This shape-shifting works on me.

It always takes a while for me to recognize them, or someone has to tip me off.

I guess it's because I'm so trusting.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Oct, 2008 03:12 pm
Yeah, I meant that it would be pretty darn impossible to define rules that would effectively do what you want here. And if you know something about rules engines then you know what the pitfalls are.
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2008 12:59 am
Agreed - it was but a whim
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Let's play "Caption the Photo" II - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
Video of the day - Discussion by dagmaraka
Freestyle Rap Battle Lyrics Translated - Discussion by Robert Gentel
2008 Election: Political Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Funny Pictures ***Slow Loading*** - Discussion by JerryR
Do i have the power to end a thread? ^^ - Discussion by crayon851
youtube comedy - Discussion by edgarblythe
Has there been a roll call? - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Kids today are spoiled! - Discussion by DrewDad
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.34 seconds on 11/26/2009 at 06:32:47 Top End